10ofRods
Verified Anthropologist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,560
- Reaction score
- 194,958
Another lurker about to post! I’ve been lurking since the start of the Jennifer Farber case. The one thing I learned from that case is we know 1% of what LE does. I understand and respect only things in the MSM can be discussed, but what I don’t understand is why hearsay is allowed. I am in no way trying to be difficult (please be kind!) it’s a genuine question. I assumed, after reading hours of posts, AS had made a statement that TS lied. He did not. We only know what RD said he said. I actually believe it, but I don’t think it should be taken as fact. AS nor LE made public statements with those words. I think they probably said it, but before the video was studied. If I saw that video, I would have cried n thought Liar! But what if then I was shown evidence GS did get out the other side? We don’t know any of this, LE does. Where is TS now? How do we know she and AS are not together? Where is biomom? I do NOT think bio-mom had anything to do with it, but how are there no discussion about people from her life. Statistical fact-very small percentage of young child are in their fathers care, not mothers. What if someone from bio-moms life was out for revenge? I would have thought that would have been discussed. When I first started obsessing over this case, I immediately thought of what led to those young children being in their dads care, that that life I would want to look into. I know this was long and is an unpopular opinion, but hope it can be respected. I respect this site, people n rules greatly.
Not contracting myself- I think it might be TS- just trying to see all possible sides and perhaps a more open dialogue.
Good post. This case is particularly difficult in terms of "hearsay" and MSM/LE "facts." There is SO much social media (including video - it's hard not believe one's eyes and ears). Video released by LS (but we can't use it in discussion here yet).
Many of us are not taking everything as "fact," but if one follows the story closely as it unfolds on SM, it's hard not to put that together with what LE and LS have said...in a kind of story.
While AS did not say that LS lied, the neighbor said he reacted strongly to the video and we know that LS was...asked to leave the family home shortly after? Surely there can be an inference made about his state of mind? TS's last known location was on SM, so we can't discuss it.
One of my frustrations at WS is that people keep asking questions that can't possibly have answers that fall under our TOS here. We all want to know a lot more, but it isn't possible. I agree with you that people should not make things up to fill in the gap (unless explicitly trying to float a possible theory).
We can't discuss LH's family, period. No sleuthing of victims. It's not just an unpopular opinion, it's not the custom here. There are other places you can discuss such things though.
Mods would have to weigh in, but I think one can say "What if there are other actors in the story - possible other family members - who could be involved." But most of us aren't going to weigh in on such an (implausible to me) story. The known facts and the behavior of LE are my focus right now, and the focus of many of us. If LE starts sending personnel to South Carolina, I will change my theories.