Compensation is theoretically covered by the 5th Amendment, so presumably the landowner wouldn't have to file a tort claim. However:
"Despite this [5th Amendment] protection, many courts have denied takings claims made by innocent third party landowners when police officers caused damage to their property during the course of executing their official duties. These courts held that the damage was not for a "public use" in the narrow sense, and have refused to analyze the claims undertakings jurisprudence. This narrow view of "public use" ignores the fact that society as a whole benefits from the police activity, including any resulting damage to property, while the innocent, individual owner alone is forced to bear the burden."
https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/...com/&httpsredir=1&article=1382&context=wmborj