Just as a follow-up, and no I do not have a link but I do have a message that I got a reply from Sam.
I questioned him, as I did someone else who posted here, that they were allowed to show the timeline that was talked about yesterday. I had said I did not think that such was allowed to be presented to the jury wants it went back because it was just a creation by the prosecution of evidence. It was not evidence.
I just received a private communication from Sam who said that yes, it was going to be allowed to go back with a jury.
I had questioned an original poster about this, and the original poster commented back to me that it was not just for a compilation for the jury, it was actually a legal document that was in fact shared amongst legal folks during the investigation so therefore it was admitted. To the original poster and a Sam, thank you! They will have the timeline!