I haven't heard of any evidence that she was abducted from her apartment (or home). It seems more likely that she met someone somewhere.
I don't think we have enough to know whether police think she was killed where her body was found, or elsewhere and her body dumped. It does appear that, if her body was dumped, that it was done in haste, because there was no apparent attempt to conceal the body.
Another significant point is that the presser was on the 3rd and the sheriff was confident that there was no threat to the public.
Jefferson Co inmates for January 3rd
Oh, that's not all inmates, just those booked on 1/3/18. Ah. Maybe that is everyone booked on that day.
Thanks for all that info BRRI - are you thinking someone else was kidnapped or that the kidnap was Natalie been taken?
I’m starting to wonder if she was kidnapped. As mentioned here, there are about 50000 theories out there. There are a few family members who do seem reliable and seemed to be active in Natalie’s life. Certain things they have said are starting to make me wonder. Of course the specifics can’t be discussed here, but I won’t be shocked if we hear that she was taken from her residence. Maybe not forcefully, but not exactly Natalie going out for a fun day out with friends.
The kidnapping charge and vehicle theft at the approx time and date of the missing persons report is strange, as well.
I'm sure the police are scouring security cameras all over the area to try to see if anything was recorded. It sounds like the disappearance happened in broad daylight, so maybe there is some evidence on tape.
Also, they have to be obtaining cell records. Do we know if NB had her phone on her from the time she disappeared? Or whether it was recovered?
Usually when someone is kidnapped (and word of that kidnapping makes it to police) and the person is found deceased, the police will state this link openly i.e. Person A was kidnapped, is now a missing person, has been found deceased.This serves a purpose - members of the public need to know the context to know if they have information that the police would want to hear.
True. But police are not saying much of anything at all. No details other than where she was found, when, and her name really.
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?
Do we have evidence that she was snatched from her home?
Here are the exhibits that NB used at the protection order hearing on December 22. Again, this is a public document, downloaded from the court's website.
The initial reports stated she went missing from her apartment in Broomfield.
Id be surprised if her address was available on the internet within a week or two of moving. Its possible he got it from someone though Id imagine anyone that knew her brand new address wouldve known he was stalking her and been smart enough not to share that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also of note, one of the neighborhood maps showed this from the day Natalie was reported missing, and the approx. time the report went in. Could also be unrelated, but worth sharing.
SBM.
I hate it when they say that. It is an absolutely meaningless statement, IMO, and you shouldn't read anything into it. The same statements have repeatedly been made in the Maggie Long case, and yet we have no arrests, no info from the police.
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?