Found Deceased CO - Natalie Bollinger, 19, Broomfield, 28 Dec 2017 #1 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also of note, one of the neighborhood maps showed this from the day Natalie was reported missing, and the approx. time the report went in. Could also be unrelated, but worth sharing. 7ABF068F-AD02-4988-959E-7391F0FBC625.jpg
 
I haven't heard of any evidence that she was abducted from her apartment (or home). It seems more likely that she met someone somewhere.

I don't think we have enough to know whether police think she was killed where her body was found, or elsewhere and her body dumped. It does appear that, if her body was dumped, that it was done in haste, because there was no apparent attempt to conceal the body.

Thank you for this post. I believe much of what we are reading and seeing (besides verified court documents and MSM reports) are based on a lot of speculation at this point. It will be very interesting to see what info is released in the days to come.

:cow:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks for all that info BRRI - are you thinking someone else was kidnapped or that the kidnap was Natalie been taken?
 
Another significant point is that the presser was on the 3rd and the sheriff was confident that there was no threat to the public.

SBM.

I hate it when they say that. It is an absolutely meaningless statement, IMO, and you shouldn't read anything into it. The same statements have repeatedly been made in the Maggie Long case, and yet we have no arrests, no info from the police.
 
Jefferson Co inmates for January 3rd
attachment.php

Respectfully, that's not a lot of inmates for a county with a population of 565,000.

EDITED TO ADD: Oh, that's not all inmates, just those booked on 1/3/18. Ah. Maybe that is everyone booked on that day.
 
Thanks for all that info BRRI - are you thinking someone else was kidnapped or that the kidnap was Natalie been taken?

I’m starting to wonder if she was kidnapped. As mentioned here, there are about 50000 theories out there. There are a few family members who do seem reliable and seemed to be active in Natalie’s life. Certain things they have said are starting to make me wonder. Of course the specifics can’t be discussed here, but I won’t be shocked if we hear that she was taken from her residence. Maybe not forcefully, but not exactly Natalie going out for a fun day out with friends.

The kidnapping charge and vehicle theft at the approx time and date of the missing persons report is strange, as well.
 
I’m starting to wonder if she was kidnapped. As mentioned here, there are about 50000 theories out there. There are a few family members who do seem reliable and seemed to be active in Natalie’s life. Certain things they have said are starting to make me wonder. Of course the specifics can’t be discussed here, but I won’t be shocked if we hear that she was taken from her residence. Maybe not forcefully, but not exactly Natalie going out for a fun day out with friends.

The kidnapping charge and vehicle theft at the approx time and date of the missing persons report is strange, as well.

I'm sure the police are scouring security cameras all over the area to try to see if anything was recorded. It sounds like the disappearance happened in broad daylight, so maybe there is some evidence on tape.

Also, they have to be obtaining cell records. Do we know if NB had her phone on her from the time she disappeared? Or whether it was recovered?
 
I'm sure the police are scouring security cameras all over the area to try to see if anything was recorded. It sounds like the disappearance happened in broad daylight, so maybe there is some evidence on tape.

Also, they have to be obtaining cell records. Do we know if NB had her phone on her from the time she disappeared? Or whether it was recovered?

Unofficially all of her belongings were left behind. Phone and wallet/id were found in the apartment. Again, unofficially.
 
Usually when someone is kidnapped (and word of that kidnapping makes it to police) and the person is found deceased, the police will state this link openly i.e. Person A was kidnapped, is now a missing person, has been found deceased.This serves a purpose - members of the public need to know the context to know if they have information that the police would want to hear.
 
Usually when someone is kidnapped (and word of that kidnapping makes it to police) and the person is found deceased, the police will state this link openly i.e. Person A was kidnapped, is now a missing person, has been found deceased.This serves a purpose - members of the public need to know the context to know if they have information that the police would want to hear.

True. But police are not saying much of anything at all. No details other than where she was found, when, and her name really.
 
True. But police are not saying much of anything at all. No details other than where she was found, when, and her name really.


Agree, but kidnapping in the mix is a pretty big detail. Telling the public would increase the scope for eyewitnesses from the community to come forward if they saw something in the vicinity of the kidnapping...if they thought it was her.
 
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?
 
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?

LE say that in alot of cases - IMO it's said when they have enough evidence to suggest Natalie's death was in isolation - not someone running round killing people.
 
Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?

They have been talking in circles. They implied it was not random but then later said they wouldn’t say she was targeted.
 
Do we have evidence that she was snatched from her home?

Snipped for focus - I’ve been looking for this information.

I believe in MSM it has said she was last seen at her apartment, but I haven’t seen details of whether she left her apartment willingly to go somewhere else or if she was taken/confronted there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Here are the exhibits that NB used at the protection order hearing on December 22. Again, this is a public document, downloaded from the court's website.

Wow...I can feel her panic as I read those as if I was in her shoes. Anyone who has been in this situation knows the feeling and it is inescapable. It makes her facebook message stating she finally felt safe so much more heartbreaking. Reading those exhibits, I can only imagine how SS would feel once a permanent restraining order was put in place. It is so frightening.
 
Natalie had a boyfriend but he’s been kind of oddly silent. Social media deactivated. Hopefully just grieving. I haven’t seen anyone mention seeing him at any vigils though
 
The initial reports stated she went missing from her apartment in Broomfield.

I’d be surprised if her address was available on the internet within a week or two of moving. It’s possible he got it from someone though I’d imagine anyone that knew her brand new address would’ve known he was stalking her and been smart enough not to share that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah I see your point. It is interesting.
 
Also of note, one of the neighborhood maps showed this from the day Natalie was reported missing, and the approx. time the report went in. Could also be unrelated, but worth sharing.
attachment.php

Now that is the very day she went missing so I don;t think it could be her. They would absolutely announce if someone had been arrested for kidnapping her. I'd love to know more about that.

SBM.

I hate it when they say that. It is an absolutely meaningless statement, IMO, and you shouldn't read anything into it. The same statements have repeatedly been made in the Maggie Long case, and yet we have no arrests, no info from the police.

Would it be appropriate to say that with LE claiming there's no threat to the public that they're basically implying whatever happened wasn't random? Or is it more of a they-were-just-saying-things-to-say-things sorta thing that we can't really pull anything from?

Yeah, they say that either when they have a suspect in custody already on something else or when the person was targeted, or was killed by a specific person, in relation to their relationship - spouse, parent, etc.

That statements would fit a stalker. It would also fit an angry boyfriend situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
77
Guests online
184
Total visitors
261

Forum statistics

Threads
608,901
Messages
18,247,440
Members
234,495
Latest member
Indy786
Back
Top