Hi Everyone, I was recommended to read Roger's forum by a friend (you know who you are
) and I know I am a decade late but wow it did not disappoint! Took me 2 days but I finally managed both threads. I must congratulate so many of you on sticking around and adding to this after over a decade!
There are a couple of opinions/questions I wanted to add, hopefully I won't repeat what's already been said before, while it's all still fresh in my mind. (I'm sorry I won't be inserting quotes directly from the threads but it's a huge thread and it'll take me 2 days to find all the quotes I want...I'll be paraphrasing I hope no one minds).
Before I start, I wanted to say that LE has always listed this as
"probably murdered by someone he knew soon after he disappeared". Well that tells me everything I need to know. Clearly LE already know the answer and just never had enough evidence or enough guts to prosecute, otherwise surely it would have been much easier to keep it listed as a simple "runaway case" and forget about it. I feel coinfident that the LE position is correct.
1) So, Roger asked his lockermate to hold the door to the locker open as he needed to retrieve a book for his first lesson. My question is,
where's the book? He grabbed the book from his locker so presumably wherever he went he was carrying the book. (this question also extends to whatever else he was carrying, was it usual for kids in the US to carry a school bag/backpack.satchel?) I know it seems like a small thing, but it has really bothered me.
2)One of Roger's lockermates had said
"I hope Roger found what he was looking for". So does this mean that a conversation had happened at the locker that Roger was going to find something? Or a previous conversation perhaps..what was he looking for....??
justice, himself, something he'd dropped, evidence, his keys, a schoolbook....This just strikes me that this person knew exactly where Roger had gone that day.
3) Regarding Mr. Pash and this infamous assignment. I have to say I think us "sleuthies"
may have missed the boat on this one. It seems to me that he told us exactly what was in that assignment right from the start. He did it in a typically Pash way so that he could remain superior; in a tyoically teacher fashion he gave us the means to work it our for ourself but then he taunted WS by saying that no one would be smart enough to understand. The below is BBM what I think is significant:
Firstly, I don't see why the colours red or green would elicit the response of "a book". But that may be me resding too much into it. I personally focused in on the "social institutions" highlighted as he seemed to place them seperate to the others...tagged on the end. I take his "I think I may have added them" to mean "these are the ones to focus on". He never revealed exactly what Roger wrote, but I think he did tell us the subject. This was confirmed when he posted the below a couple of years later:
He was taunting us that we wouldn't be able to work it out and then I can almost hear him screaming at us the answer!
I am almost certain that Mr Pash was not involved in Roger's disappearance and had he not set this assignment we would never had heard of him. I am not sure why Roger's family took against him so. But I do think he knew who was involved and I think we are talking about someone high up like a priest, sheriff, town councillor, headteacher, coach...these kind of people.
4) That sighting by the poachers. I have to say that this seems perfectly legit to me. I, for one, would probably have not gotten myself involved either if I had seen what they saw...especially if this was a person with some influence who could have made my life hell.
Apart from it being very unlikely to lie in a death bed confession, the story was corroborated not just by the second witness but also both had polygraphs. I think it could fit in quite well with whoever took Roger taking him and executing him in a secluded spot.
Ok, as for my theories about what happened, I have 2 that are basically very similar:
A) Roger witnessed something highly illegal (rape for example) that would have been damaging enough to an influential person to destroy their lives. Unfortunately this distressed Roger enough that he could no longer keep the secret and was about to either tell or confront the person. Maybe he did in fact tell someone (headteacher or sheriff) but this person then told the wrongdoer as their loyalties were to this person. This person needed to silence Roger in order to keep their own life on track.
B) This one involves skiing (and I am not knowledgable in this area so please correct me). Roger had recently failed to male the olympic team, gutting for him I imagine. Is it possible that whoever was making the choice of who qualified was either corrupt and taking bribes or was operating some kind of "casting couch" scenario. You scracth my back and I'll make sure you get accepted. Roger refused and it played on his mind for a month or so and then threatened to expose this injustice. He sufferred for his good morals.
The thing that none of this explains is how Roger literally vanished from the school without being seen, unless the sighting of him with 2 men really was reliable and he did in fact find who he was looking for and confronted them...with tragic consequences.
It is all my opinion and just throwing out ideas. Let me know if you think I'm barking up the wrong tree.