Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One off the gates is on Monarch Estates Drive... GDs home is down the road i believe ...
Source of photo: Taken by me on 9/18/21
I may be wrong, but I don’t believe GD lives in any of the Monarch Estates subdivisions. If I read the Chaffee County Assessor website info properly, GD’s home is close to the junction of Hwy 50 and Hwy 240 at Maysville.
qPublic.net - Chaffee County, CO - Search
I love that viewer! How dare that weather geek call that baby ugly and stinky!OK, not Denver CBS/4 but a viewer did phone the newsroom at KKTV 11 this morning to complain when their meteorologist called a baby elephant ugly.
https://twitter.com/KasiaKerridgeTV/status/1458445068000399365
I may be wrong, but I don’t believe GD lives in any of the Monarch Estates subdivisions. If I read the Chaffee County Assessor website info properly, GD’s home is close to the junction of Hwy 50 and Hwy 240 at Maysville.
qPublic.net - Chaffee County, CO - Search
Thank you!Easily confused. In older pics in the DM etc, it was the younger daughter (M2) who had the blonde hair and the older daughter (m1) who had medium brown colored hair. Now, M1 is blonde and M2 is dark brunette.
From your link, Lauren Scharf said:Can someone tell me who is MM1 and who is MM2?
TIA
Meanwhile , back at the ranch...
Why is Barry dressed like he's going to a rodeo? A hoe down? A 4-H Club meeting?
What more could LE do to follow through on the partial match? They contacted the Arizona man and he declined to speak with them as far as we know. He isn't the man whose DNA is in the car, so can't be treated as a suspect or even a material witness. He can't provide exculpatory evidence because the DNA was not found on anything associated with SM's disappearance, like the bike or the helmet or the home, and because there is no reason to believe the person who left DNA in the car was anything other than a mechanic who serviced it. How would withholding the name of the Arizona man materially affect the outcome of the case in BM's favor, assuming that it was not disclosed with the terabyte of data everyone seems to be sorting through - still?
Further, assuming that the allegation is true, that the prosecution didn't offer testimony about this in the PH, where is the obligation to do that? And how would non-disclosure if it happened as alleged, have prevented the judge from finding probable cause?
If we are claiming misconduct by the prosecution, we need facts and analysis, don't you think?
I tried to recognize a bullet vest. Not sure, if he is wearing one or not.LOL! And the buttons are being pulled in the front. And he’s only buttoned half way up. And the hair. He is a hot mess going to a tractor pull.
Maybe, he doesn't know, what to do with his hands, if he's not holding a weapon or the control stick of his bobcat.hands shoved in pockets all the time. I find that odd.... No arms around shoulders or holding hands? Just always shoved in pockets.... It seems deliberate and "on purpose" JMO
Thanks for the updated information, @NoSI !The "left turn" not to be confused with "the last house on the left". It's not the best video, but may give you an idea... Just remember bull elk with antlers in May... and in the pitch dark...
20210918_094121.mp4
Head down, hands in pockets.Maybe, he doesn't know, what to do with his hands, if he's not holding a weapon or the control stick of his bobcat.
hands shoved in pockets all the time. I find that odd.... No arms around shoulders or holding hands? Just always shoved in pockets.... It seems deliberate and "on purpose" JMO
What more could LE do to follow through on the partial match? They contacted the Arizona man and he declined to speak with them as far as we know. He isn't the man whose DNA is in the car, so can't be treated as a suspect or even a material witness. He can't provide exculpatory evidence because the DNA was not found on anything associated with SM's disappearance, like the bike or the helmet or the home, and because there is no reason to believe the person who left DNA in the car was anything other than a mechanic who serviced it. How would withholding the name of the Arizona man materially affect the outcome of the case in BM's favor, assuming that it was not disclosed with the terabyte of data everyone seems to be sorting through - still?
Further, assuming that the allegation is true, that the prosecution didn't offer testimony about this in the PH, where is the obligation to do that? And how would non-disclosure if it happened as alleged, have prevented the judge from finding probable cause?
If we are claiming misconduct by the prosecution, we need facts and analysis, don't you think?