The day the case was dismissed. They walked out of the courthouse behaving like petulant children who just won the lottery ... while Suzanne lays in a shallow grave. A respectable attorney doesn't reduce themselves to a fangirl of a murder. No sense of decency, No class!
Sadly, this is what made Lama so obvious and such a disappointment. Murphy was on to IE and would simply cut her off as in your done, move on. Another classic Murphy Order directed to IE relative to allegations of discovery violations (which started on her very first appearance) was IE not being able to access discovery in her possession was NOT the equivalent of the defense alleging a violation for non-receipt!
Just one of his girls.
YES 100% lived through this exact scenario and my heart goes out to her. RIPI believe any discussion about leaving together for Ecuador was just ... fantasy as lovers do. I don't think JL planned to ever leave his wife and children either, AND I don't think Suzanne wanted him to. IIRC, she was going to leave BM and not contact JL for a while.
I disagree that JL was a cad using Suzanne for a good time. Could be that she was using him or they were using each otherThey knew each other way back, she trusted him and they were also friends. I believe he helped her realize her worth and probably validated a lot of her feelings regarding BM's treatment of her.
I didn't know about this. Lauren is a professional and too kind to question IE for the reason behind her desperation to control the narrative with unhinged statements, LOL!
LS attack begins at about the 3 min mark:
At the 1 minute mark, she goes into such a load of total BULL when she says the prosecution is ignoring DNA from sex offenders all over the most critical locations, blah blah blah...Such a load of nonsense and she says it so intensely and powerfully. Turns my stomach to be honest.
At the 1 minute mark, she goes into such a load of total BULL when she says the prosecution is ignoring DNA from sex offenders all over the most critical locations, blah blah blah...Such a load of nonsense and she says it so intensely and powerfully. Turns my stomach to be honest.
She said to the crowd:
"In fact, there’s DNA that is placed on all the critical items of evidence in this case—on the bike, on the bike helmet, in the house, in the car, that is linked to unknown males, and has been linked to, uh, convicted sex offenders in this country. And the prosecution has chosen not to follow those leads."
Come on Iris, you know damn well there is no sex offender's DNA left on any of those things. It is a partial match, in other words a possible relative of a possible sex offender, that touched something in her glove box at some point in time. But hey, she was kidnapped off her bike, so who cares about her vehicles glove compartment?
ETA: Oh, and the 1980's called, they'd like their squared off shoulder pads back.
