gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,421
- Reaction score
- 230,535
Was just going to say this. Yes, most cases are circumstantial to be fair. But this is a lot of nothing and speculation so far.
Yes, legally they are. A case is really only not circumstantial when there is a direct witness to a crime.
I don’t think it’s a lot of nothing so far.
She’s told the bloke that she’s leaving him.
She has a list of 50 grievances against him.
She tells her sister he is physically and emotionally abusive.
His response to her statement that it’s over is suicidal threats.
When her husband comes home the day before she is reported missing, she is texting her secret boyfriend.
Her husband roams around the perimeter of the house before going inside, while she is communicating with the boyfriend. He later says he was shooting chipmunks.
After he comes inside, there is no further communication from Suzanne, ever.
Barry then spends a bunch of time placing his phone in and out of airplane mode and going in and out of the truck. His truck is later possibly in the vicinity of where Suzanne’s bike or helmet are later located.
He leaves early morning for a trip out of town to do a job on Mother’s Day, Sunday, a day when he knows construction is not allowed in that area.
He makes multiple stops before and during and after the hotel at various, different trash dumpsters and is seen disposing of materials, stuffing them down in the containers and the repeatedly changing clothes, in the early hours of the day she is reported missing.
He changes his story about what he was doing omg he hotel or where he was when a neighbor called about Suzanne. He is cagey about what he was throwing away, saying he does not remember.
This is big evidence.