BBM:
I think LE has shown nothing short of sheer genius in both their disclosure of having recovered a personal item, and in their refusal to identify specifically what it is they recovered.
I've said this before, but the reason this is such a brilliant move is that it really puts the perp in a state of disequilibrium.
What if the perp planted more than one item that he intended for LE to find?
What if LE is publicly stating that they've recovered "an item" but have in fact recovered more than one?
What if LE recovered something that the perp did NOT mean to leave behind, i.e., he dropped something inadvertently?
There's no way for the perp to know the answers to any of those questions.
Unless he goes out to check the location(s) where he planted items, he can't verify whether or not LE recovered what he intended them to find.
Obviously, he can't risk going back to the spot where he planted evidence, because LE may have surveillance on that area and/or on him.
It has to be driving him absolutely batty not knowing what LE has in hand.
He has no idea whether it's something he meant for them to discover, or if it's a neon flashing bread crumb he unintentionally left behind for LE.
The perp is now "completely in the dark here," as BM would say.
And I guarantee you he's extremely unhappy about that.
It really is genius on the part of LE to handle it this way.
JMO.