Feistyomi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,034
- Reaction score
- 7,870
I am not as experienced as you, but Is it possible that all the original search warrants yielded no evidence against BM , therefore LE simply started over again?, beginning with the victim’s home/last place she was seen.I disagree with you. What's smart often has little to do with typical, human behavior.
His priorities are clear. Business is super important to him. You may think he's been searching behind the scenes but where are the large search parties he organized? Where are the search centers? Where are the fliers he has created? The countless interviews and please for someone to give us information?
But more than that, more than how this shows his priorities is what it said about whether, early on, he felt it likely she would walk through that door.
I know from personal experience that when a loved one is missing, hope doesn't die, even improbable hope, that quickly. You keep feeling they're going to walk through the door, or you'll get a call that it's all been a terrible mistake, or whatever.
But let's be clear - LE doesn't get a search warrant to excavate a third parties' property, damaging that property in the process, via a fishing expedition to "eliminate" possibilities. They need probable cause. And the probable cause necessary for something like that is arguably greater than what's necessary to search the victim's property.
And as to that, LE didn't search the victim and her husband's property not once, but twice, over a month apart, despite the fact that she supposedly disappeared while on a bike ride. That's more than just elimination, IMO. I could understand one search of a location for that purpose. Not two.
IANAL, but I believe you HAVE made progress, explaining probable cause and search warrants to me, so would her disappearance be valid for the second search warrant probable cause.? Would it have to involve BM at all, other than he is part owner/resident?, not suspicion or guilt.
Also, at time of second search of house, did they go back to location of bike, and would they have needed search warrant for this, who owned property where we assume bike was found?
I am trying to review and actually put together an evidence list. I appreciate your expertise in advance.