Warning: Long post ahead (I don’t post often so this makes up for it lol)
Thanks for your response
@10ofRods, I really enjoy reading your posts! I appreciate your thoughts, and points well taken.
![Smile :) :)]()
. When I start following a case, I keep an open mind and consider all options while keeping a close eye on how LE is handling the case and in missing persons cases especially, the behaviors of the person closest to the victim/last to see them before they went missing, and as the case unfolds and the info about the circumstances of how the person ended up missing and other pertinent info/evidence is revealed, draw logical conclusions as to why, what, and in cases where it’s obvious foul play occurred, whom is responsible for causing the person to disappear.
The other day someone here mentioned that SM was potentially harmed by someone she knew well, and I decided to chime in since it’s the only other theory I seriously considered very early on. I attempted to describe what goes on in my head when I consider that Suzanne was harmed by someone she knew well because this person wanted more than just a friendship with her but Suzanne didn’t want same, (I really couldn’t think of any other reason someone she knew well would cause serious harm to this beautiful soul), resulting in this person harming her at her home or abducting her from her home and harming her at a different location. Most people when rejected are hurt sure, but once the initial sting subsides, accept it and move on, but I digress. I concluded this theory isn’t plausible as I couldn’t logically make the pieces fit as it requires me to do too many mental gymnastics for it to add up/make sense, as well as ignore how LE has handled the case from early on and the Spouse’s actions,
inaction, since Suzanne went missing.
As far as the theory this person could have waited for her to leave and waylays her on her bike ride, tosses the bike etc., leaving no DNA behind, I find implausible, plus LE never confirmed there was a bike ride, and there was no mention of it their recent Press Release.
Suzanne’s phone records and Social Media activity should reveal who all Suzanne was communicating with, and I would assume LE has all those records by now. And as others have pointed out, the messages could have been erased or deleted and/or SM may have been communicating with this person on an untraceable app and that’s why LE is asking for person(s) to come forward. I don’t believe she was conspiring to take off with them, more likely she was confiding in them about BM abuse and how unhappy she was. The Daughter’s could be afraid to come forward too. They would know what went on in the home, and fearful of getting “someone” in trouble, which is understandable since they’d lose the only parent they have left.
Like you, as much as I’d like to believe it to be true, I really don’t think the theory that Suzanne took off with this person to get away from BM and could be in contact with her Daughters is plausible because as you stated it would be odd for LE to still be on the case. I do think Suzanne wanted to get away from BM, but via getting a Divorce, not running away-I trust Suzanne wouldn’t put her Daughters and her Family through all this anguish.
I personally feel there’s a treasure trove of evidence on SM & BM phones that will prove to be damning for BM.
Honestly, once I really focused in on how LE was handling this case from very early on, calling the CBI & FBI in to assist in the first few days, and BM’s actions and
inaction since Suzanne went “missing” , raised ginormous glaring red flags: No immediate public plea for his missing wife via MSM because it was “too soon”; bike ride narrative; staged bike scene; BM offering up ridiculous theories-Mountain Lion attacked SM, she had an accident and got in the river; “let me show you what happened” (how does he know what happened he wasn’t there); not organizing public searches; not handing out flyers; didn’t organize a vigil for SM; petitioning for permanent guardianship of his wife and control over her assets while she is just recently “missing”; buying and selling property/the Family Home; the loud sound heard late at night at the jobsite by the neighbor (if BM, I don’t think it was for innocent reasons); LE dig up his worksite; SM communications with friend being cutoff on Saturday; the whole wall redo job/hotel fiasco and all the circumstances surrounding it-for a job that was not urgent and he didn’t even have the proper tools or permit to be allowed work there on weekends; truck EVI doesn’t match BM timeline according to what CBI told AM; lying about haven taken a polygraph and voice stress analysis test; bashing LE for messing up evidence (how does he know there was evidence at the bike scene); bashing his employees for speaking out, and anyone else who speaks up against him; calling the massive search AM organized for HIS missing wife a publicity stunt; didn’t attend Suzanne’s vigils; AM mentioning things weren’t “hunky dory” and Domestic Violence; there’s more I’m sure but this post is long enough lol ....It is the totality of the way LE has handled this case from early on plus the Spouse’s actions and
inaction, in addition to what we’ve learned from AM, that pretty much seals the deal for me that BM is responsible for disappearing Suzanne.
IMHO
#FindSuzanne
#BringSuzanneHome
#JusticeForSuzanne