Compassionate Reader
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,357
- Reaction score
- 119
IIRC, the only information obtained back in '94 was a blood type which can only exclude a donor, not definitively identify a donor. That's why the extra testing is needed. I hope the necklace wasn't lost, too. However, if it was, what else is new? It's not the first piece of evidence in this case to go mysteriously missing.