HeartofTexas
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 4,320
- Reaction score
- 43
Amen to that! Somewhere there is a vast Republican play book constructed by Karl Rove, and that one's definitely in it.it may well have come from a Karl Rove memo.
Amen to that! Somewhere there is a vast Republican play book constructed by Karl Rove, and that one's definitely in it.it may well have come from a Karl Rove memo.
That is of course based on what one considers serious vs trivial! Your "trivial" may not be the same as those with quote second-grade mentality, which I will state again, we wonder what is wrong with this country, one cannot pick and chose what is trivial and what is not when it comes to right and wrong... (JMO, of course!) (Don't believe you are trying to say because one may think Clinton was also in the wrong means, one has no mentality.)Nova said:Well, no, what's wrong with this country is that at least half the population never matured beyond a second-grade mentality.
Grown-ups recognize that some "wrongs" are serious, some are trivial, but all may be evaluated in terms of the harm directly caused by said "wrong."
Yes you are right she was legal,(though not so sure how one see's big difference in a 17 yr old vs one who is 18 yrs old, pretty similar mentality one would think!) That being said no clinton was not considered a child molester, but he was the PRESIDENT!! Don't believe that makes his actions any more ok than someone else's.reb said:HELLO..... clinton wasn't a child molester, at least she was legal.
Monica Lewinsky was born in 1973 and began having an affair with Clinton in 1995, making her 22 years old. I don't know where you are getting this 17/18 year old info from, but it is inaccurate.Straitfan said:Yes you are right she was legal,(though not so sure how one see's big difference in a 17 yr old vs one who is 18 yrs old, pretty similar mentality one would think!) That being said no clinton was not considered a child molester, but he was the PRESIDENT!! Don't believe that makes his actions any more ok than someone else's.
Masterj said:Monica Lewinsky was born in 1973 and began having an affair with Clinton in 1995, making her 22 years old. I don't know where you are getting this 17/18 year old info from, but it is inaccurate.
Straitfan said:That is of course based on what one considers serious vs trivial! Your "trivial" may not be the same as those with quote second-grade mentality, which I will state again, we wonder what is wrong with this country, one cannot pick and chose what is trivial and what is not when it comes to right and wrong... (JMO, of course!) (Don't believe you are trying to say because one may think Clinton was also in the wrong means, one has no mentality.)
SadieMae said:...who wants to bet the priest he "says" molested him is someone dead?
And 18, 22, and what he was approx 30 yrs older, which is/nor has never been my point to begin with.. He was the President!!, whether she was 15 or 30 does not play in my equation!.. He was a public , elected servent who had the responibilty as well as the rest of them to do right! Rep/Dem makes no difference whatsoever when it comes down to right and wrong.Masterj said:Monica Lewinsky was born in 1973 and began having an affair with Clinton in 1995, making her 22 years old. I don't know where you are getting this 17/18 year old info from, but it is inaccurate.
They said on CNN tonight that his so called molestor is still alive. It makes no difference to me in my opinion about Foley. It is hard to beleive his allegation when he only comes out with this after he is in trouble. If he was molested, get the Preist off the street and in jail. But it will not change what Foley was up to.SadieMae said:Foley just totally wierds me out. My hinky meter is way up on him...who wants to bet the priest he "says" molested him is someone dead? I think Foley is a liar all the way around. JMO
Becba said:They said on CNN tonight that his so called molestor is still alive. It makes no difference to me in my opinion about Foley. It is hard to beleive his allegation when he only comes out with this after he is in trouble. If he was molested, get the Preist off the street and in jail. But it will not change what Foley was up to.
Straitfan said:And 18, 22, and what he was approx 30 yrs older, which is/nor has never been my point to begin with.. He was the President!!, whether she was 15 or 30 does not play in my equation!.. He was a public , elected servent who had the responibilty as well as the rest of them to do right! Rep/Dem makes no difference whatsoever when it comes down to right and wrong.
Good point, Nova. I hadn't thought yet about how he could have protected others by speaking up a lot sooner if he was indeed molested by a priest. Doesn't say much for the guy, does it?Nova said:Yes, indeed. And how odd that he waited until now to speak up and protect others from that priest, given that Foley was head of a committee formed to protect minors.
IdahoMom said:Mercieca said there was one night when he was in a drug-induced stupor and there was an incident but he couldn't clearly remember, the newspaper reported.