This statement confuses me. Does it mean that disinfecting your groceries is more effective versus facemasks, gloves, etc?
“The most effective hygiene measure in helping to reduce the prevalence of the disease was to disinfect products purchased from the market once back home (which reduced the risk by 94%). This was found to be more effective than other hygiene measures, such as the use of facemasks, gloves, disinfecting with ethanol or bleach, disinfecting shoes, and washing clothes when returning home.”
First of all, the study is in Andalusia and their conclusion about dogs is mere correlation, with no known mechanism of causation. Indeed, since dog owners in Andalusia go out of their houses frequently to walk their dogs, it's safe to assume they run into other people (who are the actual vector for CV-19). There's no evidence whatsoever in actual studies of dog noses and sputum that dogs spread coronavirus.
Companion animals likely do not spread COVID-19 but may get infected themselves
The actual article states that living with a CV positive person was the greatest risk factor::
//The results showed that the risk of suffering from COVID-19 is 60 times higher among those who cohabit with a COVID-19 patient. In addition, of all the socio-demographic variables analyzed, the one with the most powerful effect in terms of increasing the risk of contracting the disease (by up to 78%) was living with a dog and
taking it for a walk. By contrast, having cats or other types of pets had no significant effect on the prevalence of the disease.//
We know that some cats can get CoVid (and get sick) and yet no transmission (because they are kept indoors in the studies where there were cat owners). Sidewalks are potential CV transmission vectors (virions lasting there for several hours).
The grocery delivery issue is puzzling (and is not replicated anywhere else in the world that I can find). Again, there's a correlation but no study or proof of causation. I'm quite certain that people who disinfect their food packaging are also wearing masks and social distancing and in general very much more concerned about the virus. In fact, I'd bet that many of them are also taking Vitamin D, etc. Until those variables are disentangled, attributing the lower COVID rate to grocery-washing seems absurd to me. Many people simply leave their groceries outside the house for a few hours - and unless this study can be replicated outside of Spain, I'm not convinced. In fact, other studies have shown no real advantage to washing everything with disinfectant (hard surfaced objects like some boxes can probably harbor COVID for a while).
I'm also confused by the fact that home delivery seemed riskier (in Spain) than going to the grocery store. Are most markets outdoors? Do the elderly talk to their delivery people? Because we know mask wearing works and aside from this one general study, there are no others I can find that imply grocery delivery is a problem. Wouldn't curbside pick-up be just as bad? Why are we not seeing more COVID amongst those of us who get delivery? (There are a lot of people getting delivery - and not washing all their packages...yet no study shows that as a vector in the US or UK or elsewhere).
This article from JAMA states that washing one's hands and faces after handling groceries (whether delivered or self-purchased), throwing away grocery bags (washing again after touching them of course), and then waiting 24 hours to touch the groceries (and then washing hands again) should be enough:
Food Safety and COVID-19