Woe.be.gone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 13,022
- Reaction score
- 225
I'm saying that the narratives and the diagrams, as well as particular evidence markers show that where we see a skull is the same place that it is documented as being found. Tree T2 is a Swamp Bay and is west of the skull. It's in lane 5 or 6...south of lane 4. The skull is northeast of T2.
The perspective in some photos is misleading so many don't think it's possible that this is the skull. Also, they don't believe LE would release it. I think that was a mistake because it's not readily apparent. But, imo and in viewing the diagrams it's more likely than not that this is the skull in the photo. I see what's there. It's not pixels or pixies, it's a skull. It's even facing the same way LE said it was...back of skull to the southeast and face of skull to the northwest. I'll see if I can snip out a portion of a diagram to show it. That's about as objective as I can get.
Thanks Marina. I didn't realize anyone else was here that claimed to see it. Back in Crime Scene #1 thread there were many peeps who claimed they could see it. It was discussed that the release must have been an error.
I'm wondering if some older computers may distort, etc.