Porfiry Petrovich
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
I have found that *advertiser censored* does indeed satisfy all the criteria mentioned in the comment on the nhregister and reproduced in this thread by Want To Help. If (and that is a big if) it is the case that the comment on nhregister has identified the suspect, then *advertiser censored* is the suspect. No more circles. No more ambiguity. See for yourself.
"*advertiser censored* attends Yale as an undergrad and works for Professors connected with Bennett Labs. He helps Bennett Labs publish an article in 2004/2005."
Well, here is an article fitting that description and it has *advertiser censored*'s name:
http://mcb.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/11/4792
And I have found another article fitting that description (published in 2004) in which *advertiser censored* receives an honorable mention for his "technical assistance."
Also, if you do an intelius search, you will see *advertiser censored* also lived in Rochester, NY.
Important Caveat: successfully identifying the suspect under consideration is not the same as identifying the actual culprit.
"*advertiser censored* attends Yale as an undergrad and works for Professors connected with Bennett Labs. He helps Bennett Labs publish an article in 2004/2005."
Well, here is an article fitting that description and it has *advertiser censored*'s name:
http://mcb.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/11/4792
And I have found another article fitting that description (published in 2004) in which *advertiser censored* receives an honorable mention for his "technical assistance."
Also, if you do an intelius search, you will see *advertiser censored* also lived in Rochester, NY.
Important Caveat: successfully identifying the suspect under consideration is not the same as identifying the actual culprit.