GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #69

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are we compiling a list of afitzy’s rediscovered words?

Marshal/marshalling
Candor
Rubbish (a gem!)
Rubbish is a longstanding personal fav! Can be used in SO many situations!

Horns arguments are usually rubbish!

I sincerely question MTs candor in the 8+hrs of LE interviews.

I sincerely question the candor of BOTH atty Michael rose and GAL atty Michael Meehan on the stand at the MT trial.

I sincerely question the candor of Petu on the stand at MT trial.

And on and on and on!

Moo
 
Is anyone else simply disgusted that MT and Horn think it remotely appropriate to suggest to the CT Courts that MT sitting in Miami pre sentencing enjoying the sun and easy access to South America is remotely appropriate?

Simply seems like a “middle finger move” to me?

Thoughts?

IMG_1092.jpegI am frankly a bit incensed that the State didn’t simply file a motion to revoke their prior suggestion for presentencing release bond. PERIOD THE END.

MT had 4 years of pretrial flying with no questions asked, she skied and travelled and ate churros to her hearts content too!

She is now a convicted but unsentenced felon!

Enough!

Moo
 
Last edited:
Looks like Mama Troconis will have to find a new Airbnb or apt closer to Niantic.

With the stat we saw that on avg inmates in CT serve 44% of their sentences that even with a 50 year sentence that MT might only serve 22 years for her role in the murder of JF.

Not sure how I’m feeling about this?

No bueno.
What is the point to sentence someone to 50 years but let them out in 22?
I never understood why our justice system does that. I don’t care how well she behaves, who she helps to learn a new language or how to find God in their life! JD is dead forever, and MT should spend every single day of her sentence to remind her of that! This is BS!
 
You can’t lie in Court. Contempt of Court is always on the table for anyone.

Additionally:
If you lie as a witness, you can be impeached on cross. This will draw a jury instruction that the witnesses’ testimony may be disregarded.
A lying attorney could be sanctioned or disbarred.
The Judge can take his or her opinion that a defendant is lying on the stand into account at sentencing.
The Judge can also instruct the jury at anytime that they can make a negative inference from anyone lying under oath.
Beautiful!
 
Is anyone else simply disgusted that MT and Horn think it remotely appropriate to suggest to the CT Courts that MT sitting in Miami pre sentencing enjoying the sun and easy access to South America is remotely appropriate?

Simply seems like a “middle finger move” to me?

Thoughts?

View attachment 490448If
YES! Quite outrageous! How stupid do they think we are? I was surprised to read that she would not have to return to court to receive ankle bracelet if she made bail. All moot at this point...
 
Yes, @Megnut is indeed blessed by amazing superpowers that us mere mortals can only dream of! Glad it worked! That post is a keeper and wish we could keep those posts as sticky items for reference.

Read it. So, do I task my snarky law librarian new friend with locating the CT Practice relevant sections as I believe that it might be correct to say, “Hartford we have a problem”?

I can’t honestly say I can recall ever watching a trial with so many issues relating to “candor”. Kudos to the ABA for picking such a wonderful word even though I am partial to using the word, “whopper”! But instead I will now simply instead question someone’s “candor”! Will be adding this wonderful word to the arsenal along with marshaling which has opened up new avenues of improved productivity from colleagues that I never expected. Very powerful word!

Would this “candor” guideline/rule possibly apply also to the issue of the Moody cite or could Horn simply not understand Moody? The response from Atty McGuiness left me thinking it could be both as my snarky law librarian friend believes the Horb cite to be a “nope”……
Although I’ve heard the word,I don’t think I ever used it in a sentence my whole life! Who says “candor”???
 
Is anyone else simply disgusted that MT and Horn think it remotely appropriate to suggest to the CT Courts that MT sitting in Miami pre sentencing enjoying the sun and easy access to South America is remotely appropriate?

Simply seems like a “middle finger move” to me?

Thoughts?

View attachment 490448I am frankly a bit incensed that the State didn’t simply file a motion to revoke their prior suggestion for presentencing release bond. PERIOD THE END.

MT had 4 years of pretrial flying with no questions asked, she skied and travelled and ate churros to her hearts content too!

She is now a convicted but unsentenced felon!

Enough!

Moo
I appreciate your candor. ;)
 
Meant to add - you can’t argue with a new word you learned from the judge that you are appealing to…
I noticed this is one of JS's favorite things to do. He did it so much that I feel it is one of his signature moves.

ISTG he, or someone related to the defense, was reading in here and read about his "thrusting" because he used that word too lol.
 
I noticed this is one of JS's favorite things to do. He did it so much that I feel it is one of his signature moves.

ISTG he, or someone related to the defense, was reading in here and read about his "thrusting" because he used that word too lol.
That is funny about “thrusting” as he seemed to try and stand up more too in trial but when he got “excited” it sadly returned. I didn’t see it in motions though….that is hilarious! Moo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
468
Total visitors
559

Forum statistics

Threads
608,237
Messages
18,236,658
Members
234,324
Latest member
Abc41021
Back
Top