GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #70

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
doodles1211

doodles1211

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 14, 2016
Messages
9,445
Reaction score
24,102
New Canaan Police are looking for a missing woman Saturday, May 25.

Jennifer Dulos, 50, was reported missing around 7:30 p.m. Friday, May 24. A sliver alert has been issued.

New Canaan Police with the assistance of the Connecticut State Police initiated a search and an investigation both of which are ongoing as of 8:45 am. Saturday..

Anyone with information related to Dulos’s whereabouts should contact Sgt. Joseph Farenga at 203-505-1332.

920x920.jpg


New Canaan Police search for missing woman

Media thread:
CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, Media, Maps, Timeline *NO DISCUSSION*

Thread #1 Thread #2 Thread #3 Thread #4 Thread #5 Thread #6 Thread #7 Thread #8 Thread #9 Thread #10 Thread #11 Thread #12 Thread #13 Thread #14 Thread #15 Thread #16 Thread #17 Thread #18 Thread #19 Thread #20 Thread #21 Thread #22 Thread #23 Thread #24 Thread #25 Thread #26 Thread #27 Thread #28 Thread #29 Thread #30 Thread #31 Thread #32 Thread #33 Thread #34 Thread #35 Thread #36 Thread #37 Thread #38 Thread #39 Thread #40 Thread #41 Thread #42 Thread #43 Thread #44 Thread #45 Thread #46 Thread #47 Thread #48 Thread #49 Thread #50 Thread #51 Thread #52 Thread #53 Thread #54 Thread #55 Thread #56 Thread #57 Thread #58 Thread #59 Thread #60 Thread #61 Thread #62 Thread #63 Thread #64. Thread #65 Thread #66 Thread #67 Thread #68 Thread #69
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please continue here.

www.websleuths.com

How to quote a post from another thread

This is for when you wish to quote a post, or quote a post from another thread or even a closed thread. Post numbers can change as a result of ongoing moderation or thread cleanups, so please don't say "it's page #" or "it's post # 913". If Mods have had to remove any number of posts within a...
www.websleuths.com www.websleuths.com
 
The five children of Jennifer Dulos may speak Friday when Michelle Troconis is sentenced in the death and disappearance of their mother.

The children, now ages 13 to 17, submitted statements for the sentencing through a family spokesperson, according to attorney Jon Schoenhorn, who represents Troconis. He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford…

Schoenhorn said about a dozen people will speak in-person or by video on Troconis' behalf and more than 65 letters, including some from around the world, have been submitted to the court supporting his client. The people speaking are mostly family and close friends.

 
sds71 said:
The five children of Jennifer Dulos may speak Friday when Michelle Troconis is sentenced in the death and disappearance of their mother.

The children, now ages 13 to 17, submitted statements for the sentencing through a family spokesperson, according to attorney Jon Schoenhorn, who represents Troconis. He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford…

Schoenhorn said about a dozen people will speak in-person or by video on Troconis' behalf and more than 65 letters, including some from around the world, have been submitted to the court supporting his client. The people speaking are mostly family and close friends.

Click to expand...

I'm embarrassed for her family and close friends already.
 
sds71 said:
The five children of Jennifer Dulos may speak Friday when Michelle Troconis is sentenced in the death and disappearance of their mother.

The children, now ages 13 to 17, submitted statements for the sentencing through a family spokesperson, according to attorney Jon Schoenhorn, who represents Troconis. He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford…

Schoenhorn said about a dozen people will speak in-person or by video on Troconis' behalf and more than 65 letters, including some from around the world, have been submitted to the court supporting his client. The people speaking are mostly family and close friends.

Click to expand...

"He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford."
Hahahaha, as if he has any say.
 
sds71 said:
The five children of Jennifer Dulos may speak Friday when Michelle Troconis is sentenced in the death and disappearance of their mother.

The children, now ages 13 to 17, submitted statements for the sentencing through a family spokesperson, according to attorney Jon Schoenhorn, who represents Troconis. He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford…

Schoenhorn said about a dozen people will speak in-person or by video on Troconis' behalf and more than 65 letters, including some from around the world, have been submitted to the court supporting his client. The people speaking are mostly family and close friends.

Click to expand...
If I read and IIUC that article, just have to observe that it was so ‘kind’ of defense counsel JS to speak about JF family and children in this matter. IMO actually it was unkind and unnecessary. IMO counsel should have instead stuck to the ‘flowery’ words for his convicted client and her cadre of friends and family. MOO

Ps. I hope someone can share a link tomorrow morning for us to watch the proceedings in Judge Randolph’s CT courtroom.
 
I am not Sherlock H. said:
If I read and IIUC that article, just have to observe that it was so ‘kind’ of defense counsel JS to speak about JF family and children in this matter. IMO actually it was unkind and unnecessary. IMO counsel should have instead stuck to the ‘flowery’ words for his convicted client and her cadre of friends and family. MOO

Ps. I hope someone can share a link tomorrow morning for us to watch the proceedings in Judge Randolph’s CT courtroom.
Click to expand...
Jumping ahead, here it is:
www.fox61.com

How to watch the Michelle Troconis sentencing

FOX61 will provide live coverage of Michelle Troconis' sentencing. There are many ways to tune in and stay in the know with up-to-the-minute details.
www.fox61.com www.fox61.com
 
sds71 said:
The five children of Jennifer Dulos may speak Friday when Michelle Troconis is sentenced in the death and disappearance of their mother.

The children, now ages 13 to 17, submitted statements for the sentencing through a family spokesperson, according to attorney Jon Schoenhorn, who represents Troconis. He said they will be allowed to speak if they wish during the proceedings in state Superior Court in Stamford…

Schoenhorn said about a dozen people will speak in-person or by video on Troconis' behalf and more than 65 letters, including some from around the world, have been submitted to the court supporting his client. The people speaking are mostly family and close friends.

Click to expand...
It is so important for Jennifer's children to be heard. They are the ultimate victims in this case.
 
Sentencing is about levying punishment for the horrific crime MT participated in-- not an opportunity for JLS to pontificate how everybody including the Judge and Jury have wronged MT!

Reportedly, JLS will may argue for her bail release pending appeal at sentencing. And JLS also filed a motion to have BOTH conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges vacated. What?

Perhaps JLS's research about two locations (Hartford and Avon) made for only one conspiracy to tamper with evidence charge did not pencil out-- so JLS is going for broke, arguing both charges should be erased as one more civil rights violation suffered by MT! :mad:

As to anybody speaking on behalf of the defendant at sentencing, I think if MT can't acknowledge her participation and show an inch of remorse, the Court should reject any motion for them to speak. Enough already of the MT's making a mockery of the U.S. Justice system! MOO

Since her conviction, Troconis has been held on $6 million bond. Schoenhorn has said Troconis will appeal the convictions after sentencing. Schoenhorn said Wednesday he will also seek her release while the appeal is pending.

[..]

Schoenhorn filed a motion on May 20 seeking to have the two conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges vacated, contending the acts were already covered under the tampering with physical evidence charges. In the motion, Schoenhorn said moving forward with the two charges would constitute "double jeopardy" and violates his client's right to due process.

Vacate two conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges...
 
Seattle1 said:
Sentencing is about levying punishment for the horrific crime MT participated in-- not an opportunity for JLS to pontificate how everybody including the Judge and Jury have wronged MT!

Reportedly, JLS will may argue for her bail release pending appeal at sentencing. And JLS also filed a motion to have BOTH conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges vacated. What?

Perhaps JLS's research about two locations (Hartford and Avon) made for only one conspiracy to tamper with evidence charge did not pencil out-- so JLS is going for broke, arguing both charges should be erased as one more civil rights violation suffered by MT! :mad:

As to anybody speaking on behalf of the defendant at sentencing, I think if MT can't acknowledge her participation and show an inch of remorse, the Court should reject any motion for them to speak. Enough already of the MT's making a mockery of the U.S. Justice system! MOO

Since her conviction, Troconis has been held on $6 million bond. Schoenhorn has said Troconis will appeal the convictions after sentencing. Schoenhorn said Wednesday he will also seek her release while the appeal is pending.

[..]

Schoenhorn filed a motion on May 20 seeking to have the two conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges vacated, contending the acts were already covered under the tampering with physical evidence charges. In the motion, Schoenhorn said moving forward with the two charges would constitute "double jeopardy" and violates his client's right to due process.

Vacate two conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence charges...
Click to expand...
@Seattle1, I'm confused procedurally how the Schoenhorn motions to vacate will be handled? Will Judge Randolph have to rule on them prior to sentencing? And, would he let these pending motions impact his eventual sentence? Judge Randolph has worked overtime imo to preserve an impeccable record for appeal and I do wonder if how these motions to vacate on 'constitutional grounds' might muddy the waters?

I'm still very confused on the issue of charging methodology when multiple identically charged acts (here is tampering and hindering) are handled when they occur in multiple locations on different days? What would happen if a group of conspirators committed a crime and then spent weeks and weeks covering it up over a wide area? Just seems like each act undertaken by a conspirator is separate and distinct and ought to be charged accordingly. It just seems like Schoenhorn is trying to merge all of the MT 'tampering and hindering' activities into a single act rather than what it was which was a series of acts and where she no doubt wasn't charged with all of the acts either.

As a layperson imo this is quite difficult to understand as it seems like the State very particularly set forth the charges and tied them to specific acts with individual dates and times. I'm trying to understand why this could/might/maybe be problematic? But, its quite concerning that all of this motion activity is happening at this late stage as I would have thought it would have been argued when the charges were first lodged such that the Appellate Court and/or Supreme Court in CT could have resolved the matter. Is this just a gambit by Schoenhorn to argue for MT release pending appeal? Very disturbing that this is happening now OR is this a legal 'nothing burger'?

MOO (Dazed and Confused here)
 
Baby baby Jane said:
Gawd. Do you think MT child will speak? I really just don’t want JF kids to experience that.( Esp if it’s via satellite from a ski lodge in Argentina….)
Click to expand...
100% certain that MT’s daughter will speak. The Troconises constantly try to do what the Farbers do, as if to equate MT and Jennifer as victims of this situation. They really think that putting a convicted conspiritor in a murder case in prison, is the same loss to NB, as Jennifer’s murder is to her 5 children.
 
BJarv said:
@Seattle1, I'm confused procedurally how the Schoenhorn motions to vacate will be handled? Will Judge Randolph have to rule on them prior to sentencing? And, would he let these pending motions impact his eventual sentence? Judge Randolph has worked overtime imo to preserve an impeccable record for appeal and I do wonder if how these motions to vacate on 'constitutional grounds' might muddy the waters?

I'm still very confused on the issue of charging methodology when multiple identically charged acts (here is tampering and hindering) are handled when they occur in multiple locations on different days? What would happen if a group of conspirators committed a crime and then spent weeks and weeks covering it up over a wide area? Just seems like each act undertaken by a conspirator is separate and distinct and ought to be charged accordingly. It just seems like Schoenhorn is trying to merge all of the MT 'tampering and hindering' activities into a single act rather than what it was which was a series of acts and where she no doubt wasn't charged with all of the acts either.

As a layperson imo this is quite difficult to understand as it seems like the State very particularly set forth the charges and tied them to specific acts with individual dates and times. I'm trying to understand why this could/might/maybe be problematic? But, its quite concerning that all of this motion activity is happening at this late stage as I would have thought it would have been argued when the charges were first lodged such that the Appellate Court and/or Supreme Court in CT could have resolved the matter. Is this just a gambit by Schoenhorn to argue for MT release pending appeal? Very disturbing that this is happening now OR is this a legal 'nothing burger'?

MOO (Dazed and Confused here)
Click to expand...

IMO, JLS received a bit of encouragement (i.e., a colorable claim to dismiss one of the two counts, per Randolph) and JLS couldn't leave it alone!

I think JLS believes the Court will uphold all of MT's charges on 5/31, and filed this last minute Motion, seeking to vacate both convicted charges, pursuant to MT's civil rights (double jeopardy/due process) just for a billable event, and more of JLS typical grandstanding. :rolleyes:

Let's call it what it is: JLS wasting the Court's time, and his last hurrah.

To be clear, nowhere did Judge Randolph promise to consider vacating both charges counts!

MSM from the prior thread:


4/10/24

But Randolph said Wednesday, he will consider vacating one of the two counts of conspiracy to commit evidence tampering after the defense argued the second violated double jeopardy laws, which prohibit anyone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime.

The counts pertain to two separate events on different days in different towns—the disposal of evidence in Hartford on May 24 and the cleaning and detailing of a red pickup truck in Avon on May 29.

But Attorney Jon Schoenhorn said the prosecution alleged the goal of both events was to destroy evidence of Jennifer Dulos’ presumed murder.

Schoenhorn argued state late doesn’t allow multiple charges for a single conspiracy. Randolph called that “a colorable claim,” which he will consider.

The judge said he will issue a ruling on whether he will vacate one of those conspiracy charges at the start of Troconis’ sentencing hearing on May 31.

Disposal of evidence equals 1 or 2 charges?
 
Last edited:
www.wfsb.com

Michelle Troconis to serve 14 1/2 years of 20-year sentence, judge rules

Michelle Troconis will be sentenced in Stamford Superior Court.
www.wfsb.com www.wfsb.com

“Troconis’ attorney, Jon Schoenhorn, told Channel 3 on Thursday that both sides have up to 2 hours to talk ahead of the sentencing.

He said Troconis will have between 12 and 20 people speak on her behalf. People have flown in from around the country and from other countries to support her. He also said people wrote and submitted 65 letters to the judge in support of Troconis.”

“Carrie Luft, a friend of Jennifer Farber Dulos, told Channel 3 that family and friends prepared statements for the court as requested and would likely comment after the sentencing.”

“The judge will take a break after the comments and later come down with the sentencing.

The sentence itself was expected to be announced later Friday afternoon.”
 
ajksmom said:
www.wfsb.com

Michelle Troconis to serve 14 1/2 years of 20-year sentence, judge rules

Michelle Troconis will be sentenced in Stamford Superior Court.
www.wfsb.com www.wfsb.com

“Troconis’ attorney, Jon Schoenhorn, told Channel 3 on Thursday that both sides have up to 2 hours to talk ahead of the sentencing.

He said Troconis will have between 12 and 20 people speak on her behalf. People have flown in from around the country and from other countries to support her. He also said people wrote and submitted 65 letters to the judge in support of Troconis.”

“Carrie Luft, a friend of Jennifer Farber Dulos, told Channel 3 that family and friends prepared statements for the court as requested and would likely comment after the sentencing.”

“The judge will take a break after the comments and later come down with the sentencing.

The sentence itself was expected to be announced later Friday afternoon.”
Click to expand...
Are the JF supporters allowed to leave the room so they can avoid experiencing the overzealous melodramatic (lying) T family laying a TWO-hour-long steaming pile of BS??
 
Last edited:
ajksmom said:
www.wfsb.com

Michelle Troconis to serve 14 1/2 years of 20-year sentence, judge rules

Michelle Troconis will be sentenced in Stamford Superior Court.
www.wfsb.com www.wfsb.com

“Troconis’ attorney, Jon Schoenhorn, told Channel 3 on Thursday that both sides have up to 2 hours to talk ahead of the sentencing.

He said Troconis will have between 12 and 20 people speak on her behalf. People have flown in from around the country and from other countries to support her. He also said people wrote and submitted 65 letters to the judge in support of Troconis.”

“Carrie Luft, a friend of Jennifer Farber Dulos, told Channel 3 that family and friends prepared statements for the court as requested and would likely comment after the sentencing.”

“The judge will take a break after the comments and later come down with the sentencing.

The sentence itself was expected to be announced later Friday afternoon.”
Click to expand...
Is 2 hours enough for JS?
 
CONNECTICUT PRACTICE BOOK
SUPERIOR COURT—PROCEDURE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

CHAPTER 43 SENTENCING, JUDGMENT AND APPEAL (pg 421)

Sec. 43-3. Presentence Investigation and Report; Waiver; Alternative Incarceration and Plan
(a) If the defendant is convicted of a crime other than a capital felony, the punishment for which may include imprisonment for more than one year, the judicial authority shall order a presentence investigation, or the supplementation of any existing presentence investigation report. The judicial authority may, in its discretion, order a presentence investigation for a defendant convicted of any crime or offense. [..]

Sec. 43-4. —Scope of Investigation or Assessment

Sec. 43-5. —Participation of Defense Counsel in Report Preparation Defense counsel, on a prompt request, shall be notified of the time when the defendant shall be interviewed by probation officers regarding a presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report or both for the judicial authority and maybe present: [..]

Sec. 43-6. —Period of Continuance To Complete Report
Sec. 43-7. —Persons Receiving Report
Sec. 43-8. —Prohibition against Making Copies

Sec. 43-9. —Use and Disclosure of Reports
The presentence investigation and alternate incarceration assessment reports shall not be public records and shall not be accessible to the public. They shall be available initially to the parties designated in Section 43-7 for use in the sentencing hearing and in any subsequent proceedings wherein the same conviction may be involved, and they shall be available at all times to the following: [..]

Sec. 43-10. Sentencing Hearing;
Procedures To Be Followed Before imposing a sentence or making any other disposition after the acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or upon a verdict or finding of guilty, the judicial authority shall, upon the date previously determined for sentencing, conduct a sentencing hearing as follows:

(1) The judicial authority shall afford the parties an opportunity to be heard and, in its discretion, to present evidence on any matter relevant to the disposition, and to explain or controvert the presentence investigation report, the alternate incarceration assessment report or any other document relied upon by the judicial authority in imposing sentence. [..]

(2) The judicial authority shall allow the victim and any other person directly harmed by the commission of the crime a reasonable opportunity to make, orally or in writing, a statement with regard to the sentence to be imposed.

(3) The judicial authority shall allow the defendant a reasonable opportunity to make a personal statement in his or her own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence.

Sec. 43-11. —Role at Sentencing of Prosecuting Authority
The prosecuting authority shall inform the judicial authority of the offenses for which the defendant is to be sentenced, shall give a brief summation of the facts relevant to each offense, shall disclose to the judicial authority any information in the files of the prosecuting authority that is favorable to the defendant and relevant to sentencing and shall state the basis for any recommendation which it chooses to make as to the appropriate sentence.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 921.)

Sec. 43-13. —Familiarization with Report by Defense Counsel
Defense counsel shall familiarize himself or herself with the contents of the presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report or both, including any evaluative summary, and any special medical or psychiatric reports pertaining to the client.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 924.)

Sec. 43-14. —Correction of Report Indicated by Defense Counsel Defense counsel shall bring to the attention of the judicial authority any inaccuracy in the presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report of which he or she is aware or which the defendant claims to exist.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 925.)

___________________________

Only the Court is granted discretion, and it does not extend to the Defense Counsel!

Again, JLS continues to flaunt the convicted defendant as worthy of taking over the sentencing hearing when the only statutory right to speak is granted to the defendant, and not her entourage!

I trust Judge Randolph is reading the headlines today and will put an end to JLS's dog and pony show at the beginning of hearing, and remind JLS that only the Victim (and any other person directly harmed by the commission of the crime a reasonable opportunity to make, orally or in writing, a statement with regard to the sentence to be imposed). are entitled to speak at sentencing.

JLS had plenty of time -- 3 months-- to contest and/or correct any misinformation in the PSI, and marching in MT's supporters is not a substitution for the procedures documented in Chapter 43.

MOO
 
Seattle1 said:
CONNECTICUT PRACTICE BOOK
SUPERIOR COURT—PROCEDURE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

CHAPTER 43 SENTENCING, JUDGMENT AND APPEAL (pg 421)

Sec. 43-3. Presentence Investigation and Report; Waiver; Alternative Incarceration and Plan
(a) If the defendant is convicted of a crime other than a capital felony, the punishment for which may include imprisonment for more than one year, the judicial authority shall order a presentence investigation, or the supplementation of any existing presentence investigation report. The judicial authority may, in its discretion, order a presentence investigation for a defendant convicted of any crime or offense. [..]

Sec. 43-4. —Scope of Investigation or Assessment

Sec. 43-5. —Participation of Defense Counsel in Report Preparation Defense counsel, on a prompt request, shall be notified of the time when the defendant shall be interviewed by probation officers regarding a presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report or both for the judicial authority and maybe present: [..]

Sec. 43-6. —Period of Continuance To Complete Report
Sec. 43-7. —Persons Receiving Report
Sec. 43-8. —Prohibition against Making Copies

Sec. 43-9. —Use and Disclosure of Reports
The presentence investigation and alternate incarceration assessment reports shall not be public records and shall not be accessible to the public. They shall be available initially to the parties designated in Section 43-7 for use in the sentencing hearing and in any subsequent proceedings wherein the same conviction may be involved, and they shall be available at all times to the following: [..]

Sec. 43-10. Sentencing Hearing;
Procedures To Be Followed Before imposing a sentence or making any other disposition after the acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or upon a verdict or finding of guilty, the judicial authority shall, upon the date previously determined for sentencing, conduct a sentencing hearing as follows:

(1) The judicial authority shall afford the parties an opportunity to be heard and, in its discretion, to present evidence on any matter relevant to the disposition, and to explain or controvert the presentence investigation report, the alternate incarceration assessment report or any other document relied upon by the judicial authority in imposing sentence. [..]

(2) The judicial authority shall allow the victim and any other person directly harmed by the commission of the crime a reasonable opportunity to make, orally or in writing, a statement with regard to the sentence to be imposed.

(3) The judicial authority shall allow the defendant a reasonable opportunity to make a personal statement in his or her own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence.

Sec. 43-11. —Role at Sentencing of Prosecuting Authority
The prosecuting authority shall inform the judicial authority of the offenses for which the defendant is to be sentenced, shall give a brief summation of the facts relevant to each offense, shall disclose to the judicial authority any information in the files of the prosecuting authority that is favorable to the defendant and relevant to sentencing and shall state the basis for any recommendation which it chooses to make as to the appropriate sentence.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 921.)

Sec. 43-13. —Familiarization with Report by Defense Counsel
Defense counsel shall familiarize himself or herself with the contents of the presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report or both, including any evaluative summary, and any special medical or psychiatric reports pertaining to the client.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 924.)

Sec. 43-14. —Correction of Report Indicated by Defense Counsel Defense counsel shall bring to the attention of the judicial authority any inaccuracy in the presentence or alternate incarceration assessment report of which he or she is aware or which the defendant claims to exist.(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 925.)

___________________________

Only the Court is granted discretion, and it does not extend to the Defense Counsel!

Again, JLS continues to flaunt the convicted defendant as worthy of taking over the sentencing hearing when the only statutory right to speak is granted to the defendant, and not her entourage!

I trust Judge Randolph is reading the headlines today and will put an end to JLS's dog and pony show at the beginning of hearing, and remind JLS that only the Victim (and any other person directly harmed by the commission of the crime a reasonable opportunity to make, orally or in writing, a statement with regard to the sentence to be imposed). are entitled to speak at sentencing.

JLS had plenty of time -- 3 months-- to contest and/or correct any misinformation in the PSI, and marching in MT's supporters is not a substitution for the procedures documented in Chapter 43.

MOO
Click to expand...
Thank you for explaining this process and procedure as what Schoenhorn was describing in the news with folks flying in from all over to speak sounded like a circus. Not unsurprising given the past behaviour of the Troconis family but disturbing for the victims all the same.

I do wonder though if Judge Randolph will cave and allow the circus as Schoenhorn has announced that people are coming? Seems most likely that Schoenhorn knew the rules (ditto for Troconis family) but perhaps instead chose a 'back door' game of simply announcing to the Court that all 22+ of our people "ARE HERE AND DEMAND TO SPEAK". If this is what Schoenhorn did it honestly seems wrong but so in keeping with him as a substandard professional and the also in keeping with the absolute disrespect that MT and her entire family showed to Judge Randolph and the CT Judiciary over the past 5 years.

But, if Judge Randolph doesn't allow the Troconis family etc. to speak then I can imagine that Schoenhorn will simply move the Circus of people outside to the Courthouse steps. Given that this might be a possibility then I am now starting a prayer chain for severe weather and torrential rain for Stamford. The weather has been quite tempermental recently so perhaps it will cooperate and bring a downpour at an opportune time!

Simply outrageous.

Shameful.

And a million other words that are not allowed.....

MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 83 more.
Total: 3,587 (members: 84, guests: 3,503)

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
3,503
Total visitors
3,587
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
604,564
Messages
18,173,461
Members
232,677
Latest member
Amakur
Back
Top