GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Agreed! Am reminded of this report:
Looking at 3:15, his attitude (IMO arrogance) needs adjusting in order for that to happen. It’s all just chilling. Hoping with you.

IF he wants a snowball’s chance of not inflicting his “sin of the father” any more than he already has, he’ll come clean.

Based on track record, though…
KM as a human being imo is a deplorable individual. I took a break from following his DV and divorce action but might go back and dig up those documents and place them on the KM thread. Sometimes you run into males that truly hate women and reading all I've read about KM the only conclusion I can draw is that as an addict/alcoholic that he no doubt hates himself but that he hates women too as his treatment of them is consistently horrific and absolutely abusive. I think he shares this view of women in common with FD but but where one was physically abusive, the other was diabolically clever in his psychological abuse over a very long period of time.
MOO
 
She gets a public defender but the documents that allow her a public defender are not available to the public. :|
@Eli9, so with you on this. Will see if FOIA can be filed to correct this situation as I don't understand why if the public will now be paying for this shitshow to continue that it isn't entitled to know the details of the financial situation. I also feel the same way about the pretrial sentencing report as that IMO should be public as the public will be paying for her incarceration.

CT Judicary IMO is a shambles operation and frankly when you are a convicted felon I think many issues of privacy should rightly be removed from the citizen as they now are effectively being supported by the poor taxpayers of the State of CT.

Shameful.

Gotta love the family grift angle though....support the felon with resources for trial and then grift from the State for the appeal. I wish that when MT loses her appeal that the State of CT SENDS HER A BILL FOR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

What enrages me further (doesn't take much with this MT situation as I'm on the very last never) is that due to her being declared 'indigent' I now believe that she will NOT have to pay the State of CT for her incarceration.

This imo is a total SHAM and GRIFT as well as absolute wrong.

MOO
 
Is there anyway to lookup if JS has applied to be a special public defender? UGH!
Yes, there is supposedly a list somewhere but it might be segregated by Courthouse in true CT disorganized fashion. I'm on road but will try to dig up the last list we had as we had checked whether Pattis was a public defender (he was). Whole topic as it relates to MT simply enrages me.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
204
Guests online
2,616
Total visitors
2,820

Forum statistics

Threads
599,885
Messages
18,100,830
Members
230,947
Latest member
tammiwinks
Back
Top