Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #10 *ARRESTS*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Good interview...well at least by Chaz, asking pointed questions. NP is very good at manipulating the English language to infer things but not answer, so listen carefully.

NP's group is following the closed FB group but didn't admit to following elsewhere, as possibly here. MT's attorney is still not allowing her to talk to him...but got the impression NP would love to also represent her. He knows she is going to testify and if a joint representation, she won't.

Don't think Chaz believes this whole spin, even though he & NP are friends.
I thought Chaz did a good job as well. He asked some of the questions we have asked.
 
Marissa Alter (@MarissaAlter) on Twitter
JUST IN: New Canaan police announce investigators have concluded their search of a Hartford trash facility in the Jennifer Dulos case. They say the case remains “active and dynamic” with dozens of investigators working to find Jennifer.

To date, they’ve received more than 950 tips and nearly 80 pieces of surveillance video.
 
Marissa Alter (@MarissaAlter) on Twitter
JUST IN: New Canaan police announce investigators have concluded their search of a Hartford trash facility in the Jennifer Dulos case. They say the case remains “active and dynamic” with dozens of investigators working to find Jennifer.

To date, they’ve received more than 950 tips and nearly 80 pieces of surveillance video.
I wonder if they've found anything.
 
Part 2
When asked why no one else is reporting MT as cleared NP said he wouldn't have said it if he didn't have good reason to say so.
Bags - from his understanding MT didn't know what was in them. As for FD? He said there is an explanation and it's compelling. He needs court documents released.
Regarding the alibi - without MT and her cooperation there is a 3 to 3 1/2 hour window. They need MT.
GG - It sounded like he was pretty familiar with the manuscript. I can only remember he mentioned it had a surprise ending.
NP talked about the closed FB page for FD/JD and said he was watching it closely (I thought he wasn't paying attention, eye roll) and that if you can't put your name on it, shut up.
NP talked about JD's costly diagnostic tests, her fascination with death and her robust imagination.

I feel dirty. Yuck.
NP mentioned the surprise ending probably because that is all he has read. NP continues to spew this Gone Girl garbage when he has admitted that he hasn't even read the 500 page manuscript. Think about it...sounds a bit ludicrous.
 
Jeeze Louize.

Regarding #7 of NP motion. MT was “overheard” saying she
a. “loves” FD
b. “Does not believe (FD) was involved”
c. “Feels badly” for FD

Since when is hearsay admissible in court? Do other competent attorneys use hearsay in motions? I now look at every move NP makes from the other side; what could be another purpose to include this rumor? Perhaps to undermine MT within her own camp? Make her lawyer and family members question her credibility or ability to stick with their game plan? Is NP trying to cause disruption in their camp?

If MT truly felt any of theses things then why isn’t her atty petitioning for her to see FD???
 
Did the LE have a lab set up at MIRA?
I don't recall reading about a lab at MIRA.

Marissa Alter (@MarissaAlter) on Twitter
JUST IN: New Canaan police announce investigators have concluded their search of a Hartford trash facility in the Jennifer Dulos case. They say the case remains “active and dynamic” with dozens of investigators working to find Jennifer.

To date, they’ve received more than 950 tips and nearly 80 pieces of surveillance video.

BBM I don't ever remember seeing the word dynamic to describe an active case but that word gives me hope. They are energetic instead of feeling a sense of fatigue or defeat. Progress is being made IMO
Hopefully we will see new charges soon.
 
In the recent radio interview NP states that there is reason to doubt JD is a victim of foul play by a 3rd party. I may have to re-listen to make sure i heard that though.
ETA yes, that is what he said.

Thanks - I need to listen to it.
 
I guess it would depend on the state. IME, if you can't get an agreement, then it goes to trial and that's where the big money is spent. And you never know what a judge will do, so better to make an agreement. JD attorney should have fast tracked this case as much as possible and forgot about things like health insurance. Focus on the kids and just get it done. But 2 years of court time...the gift that keeps on giving for a lawyer.

The health insurance is a moot point.

JD's attorney used That as an example, to show the court that FD did not care about the children and Ultimately showed the court that FD did not care about any Court Order either.

He told the judge that JD should 'Pay Out of Pocket' in regards to the children's appointments.

It was noted in a previous thread that in the State of Connecticut, Existing (prior to filing for divorce) health care coverage must remain intact through the completion of the divorce.

FD paid for the Health Insurance prior to the divorce filing.

It is not up to either party, nor up to the judge on who provides the insurance.

It is up to the judge to Enforce the Insurance Mandate but, he is unable to eliminate the mandate before the divorce is final.

FD thought he was above being told what to do by the Court and by Law.

I do not see in the available court documents where JD's attorney requested that the insurance be reinstated, but I could be wrong.

Either way, it was not about the actual insurance.

Instead, it was about FD's disregard of the Court, Judge, Laws, and His Children, just to 'stick it' to JD.
 
NP mentioned the surprise ending probably because that is all he has read. NP continues to spew this Gone Girl garbage when he has admitted that he hasn't even read the 500 page manuscript. Think about it...sounds a bit ludicrous.
Yes but he talked in more specifics this time. Like where the setting takes place (New Canaan), some of it involves a Greek, some of it involves Farmington, some of it involves disappointed love expectations, betrayal and a surprise ending. He did say he would talk more about the book either this week or next week.
 
He saw the GAL on Saturday (when FD was reported to be “excited” about “the news”). Remember he also had an appointment with the NCPD at 14:47 on Saturday. So I guess he was busy on Saturday. Maybe he was banging around making loud noises at Sturbridge that morning too.

I am all screwed up, time-wise...thinking that he met with the police on June 1. But that was the day he was arrested, so you are right; May 25 must have been the day he surrendered his phone. I had better go back and study the timeline before I ask a question!
 
Good interview...well at least by Chaz, asking pointed questions. NP is very good at manipulating the English language to infer things but not answer, so listen carefully.

NP's group is following the closed FB group but didn't admit to following elsewhere, as possibly here. MT's attorney is still not allowing her to talk to him...but got the impression NP would love to also represent her. He knows she is going to testify and if a joint representation, she won't.

Don't think Chaz believes this whole spin, even though he & NP are friends.
Yes "we" know NP is following "our" closed fb group since in the
past 4-5 days "we've" been inundated with hacks pretending
to be concerned locals but actually attempting a half-arse attempt
at defending FD and disparaging JD. Just planting doubt but
"we" all know who they are. Hey NP, major FAIL.
 
99.1 PLR on Twitter

Oh look, NP was on Chaz & AJ again this morning, his favorite platform. I'm super busy at work, so if someone could provide some Cliff's Notes on this, I'd be super grateful.
Two main points I took away from from the interview: 1. FD's alibi for the most significant time period is his girlfriend -- MT. Without MT, he does not have an alibi. 2. He is seeking to release court records about Jennifer's mental health to try to bolster his Gone Girl scenario. The second point I inferred and was not explicitly stated. IMHO.
 
I think NP is saying JD suffered violence at her home in her garbage on May 24th. He’s not saying FD caused it.

Although, we know FD did it.
jmo

Aww, well how nice of FD then to swing by her house in the middle of the day while the kids were at school (something he was not supposed to be doing), find blood in the garage and evidence of a crime, and then channel his true inner altruist and be sweet enough to clean up the scene and sneakily throw the remnants of that cleaning into 30 different dumpsters in a town he never goes to. I don't know if I'm more annoyed by the sheer stupidity and audacity of their claims, or the fact that people are going to read those quotes and assume truth to them just because NP said them.
 
Last edited:
Part 2
When asked why no one else is reporting MT as cleared NP said he wouldn't have said it if he didn't have good reason to say so.
Bags - from his understanding MT didn't know what was in them. As for FD? He said there is an explanation and it's compelling. He needs court documents released.
Regarding the alibi - without MT and her cooperation there is a 3 to 3 1/2 hour window. They need MT.
GG - It sounded like he was pretty familiar with the manuscript. I can only remember he mentioned it had a surprise ending.
NP talked about the closed FB page for FD/JD and said he was watching it closely (I thought he wasn't paying attention, eye roll) and that if you can't put your name on it, shut up.
NP talked about JD's costly diagnostic tests, her fascination with death and her robust imagination.

I feel dirty. Yuck.

I 'shuddered' just reading your summary.
 
Two main points I took away from from the interview: 1. FD's alibi for the most significant time period is his girlfriend -- MT. Without MT, he does not have an alibi. 2. He is seeking to release court records about Jennifer's mental health to try to bolster his Gone Girl scenario. The second point I inferred and was not explicitly stated. IMHO.
Wait. IIRC, MT supposedly had lunch with a friend in Simsbury around 11:30am that day (this may have been NP ramblings, so who knows). If that's true, wouldn't the friend be able to vouch for his alibi? Or is he trying to claim FD was with MT up UNTIL MT left for lunch?
 
Aww, well how nice of FD then to swing by her house in the middle of the day while the kids were at school (something he was not supposed to be doing), find blood in the garage and evidence of a crime, and then channeling his true inner altruist and being sweet enough to clean up the scene and then sneakily throw the remnants of that cleaning into 30 different dumpsters in a town he never goes in. I don't know if I'm more annoyed by the sheer stupidity and audacity of their claims, or the fact that people are going to read those quotes and assume truth to them just because NP said them.
GREAT POST, so well said. Reminds me of....nm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
237
Total visitors
332

Forum statistics

Threads
609,779
Messages
18,257,842
Members
234,756
Latest member
Kezzie
Back
Top