The Courant article is very good. FD claims he found the report and draft of the novel after the police had searched his home.
Waiting on NP/FD to claim that:
(1) JD illegally hacked into FD’s Waze account to deliberately mislead him into NY in violation of his bond conditions, as she is like Fieval somewhere out there, but wants FD forever sent away;
(2) JD maliciously planted the incomplete sealed draft custody report she stole from the clerk’s office and a tea stained copy of her alleged 500 page 19 year old GG foreshadowing novel to frame FD, the GAL, and defense counsel in both cases for this as well, which FD could not have personally done, as he is a busy attractive successful professional man still busy sweeping up; and that
(3) JD and her current and former lawyers should be sanctioned for JD’s deliberately failing to appear in person this week at the emergency custody hearing.
Who’s the real victim here?
From Samara Abramson’s tweets:
Pattis said his team is “entertaining the idea that Jennifer has died by a result of a revenge suicide.”
If by Pattis’s “team,” he means his client, Fotis Dulos, that’s about the only person I can imagine who would find this idea of JD’s revenge suicide “entertaining.”
Just another example of FD’s lack of original ideas and lack of genuine human sensitivity or creativity.
IIRC, I believe JD mentioned in her very first emergency motion and court filing seeking a protective order against FD for herself and the children upon her initial escape from him and divorce filing more than two years ago that JD feared for her life and feared for the safety of the children for a number general and very specific reasons — in particular FD sharing his sick revenge fantasies about the variety of things FD would like to do to get back at former clients FD felt had wronged him.
I said it before and I’ll say it again:
The jaundiced eye none but yellow sees.
FD is a dangerous guy. Once again we see Pattis’s biggest defense challenge is the impossible task of trying to corral his client’s narcissism. Pattis has expended and is expending a tremendous amount of airtime and energy just trying to convince FD to keep his mouth shut and to just let Pattis do all the talking. Pattis has talked and talked. He has spun and resounding. He has framed and reframed that his client is innocent; how his client was framed.
But obviously it’s still not working. For Fotis, it’s never enough.
Fork over the kids and the cash and the exoneration and an apology and ten more HOMI sweet HOMI awards.
Fotis can’t bear all the spotlight diverted from himself. He’s so used to control, he can’t take anyone speaking on his behalf, challenging his narrative/s, or censoring him. Especially not those he views as his lessers.
If FD makes it to the end of this, I predict he’ll defend Pro Se. Likely he won’t be around though: he will have escaped by then unless someone is willing to bankroll him and he stays out on bond with a blank check. He just can’t stand the scrutiny of anything less than everything.
No one is smarter than him. Nobody does it better. Nobody puts Baby in the corner. Why isn’t anyone concerned with how much I’m suffering? Why are my accounts frozen? Why are they paying so much attention to the Farbers? Why is everyone talking about Jennifer? What about my pain? What about my suffering? Why are these people acting like nobody believes me?
Waaaah waaaah waaaah
Marissa AlterVerified account @MarissaAlter
Family court status conference in Dulos divorce case is over. No decisions or discussions about custody of 5 kids. Focus was on sealed psychological evaluation in custody case. Attorney Norm Pattis acknowledged he violated judge’s order but said he was unaware of it.
@News12CT
7:47 AM - 26 Jun 2019 - pst
Did defense counsel basically just assert an ignorance of the law defense of HIMSELF in the context of at least two cases in which he has entered an appearance as attorney of record on behalf of FD?
Doesn’t Pattis have a legal duty and a professional responsibility to familiarize himself with the court’s orders before opening his mouth in front of TV cameras to discuss sealed documents in violation of the recorded orders of the court in the cases for which he is attorney of record?
Has NP never heard of the classic response to reporters, “No Comment”?
Bingo!