Twistinginthewind
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2014
- Messages
- 2,444
- Reaction score
- 19,105
Whoah, I thought it might not be copacetic for one attorney to get in the mix with defending the same person on both criminal and custody cases, and to use material from one case to try to gain leverage on the other case. Yayyyyyyyy (BBM)
Claims for Relief pt 2: - Defendant and counsel be barred from divulging info from the custody evaluation to media outlets -Counsel notify all media contacted about the custody evaluation that it was not authorized by the court and has no “evidential value”
Claims for Relief pt 3: -Disqualify Norm Pattis, Rich Rochlin, Michael Rose and any lawyers from their firms for representing Fotis in the custody or criminal cases #NBCCT
1Email response from Norm Pattis says "without commenting on the allegations in the counsel's motion, we contend we acted appropriately in the defense of our client." There is a status conference for the child custody case Wed morning at Stamford court. #NBCCT