50 threads and she was killed at 50 - will we ever find her?
Certainly remarkable and sad. Perhaps the storm will reveal some hidden evidence.
Was just reading Attorney Schoenhorn's latest filing with the Appellate Court (Link to the motion will be at the end of this post). He mentions a specific instance when MT received a call from probation:
"
On June 11, 2020, the defendant informed the assigned probation officer in advance that she would be with counsel in Farmington. The undersigned observed an incoming call from that officer. Subsequently, the officer admonished the defendant for not advising him in advance of the exact location of our meeting in Farmington, although he was tracking it via the GPS software, and it really was none of his concern."
Coincides with search of Avon Property on June 11,2020:
State Police: No evidence found in connection with Jennifer Dulos disappearance during search of Avon property
Since Judge White said to clear MT's outings with probation prior to them happening, the probation department was certainly within its scope and responsibility in questioning why a meeting with her attorney would be taking place outside of his office. Judge White clearly state, "No side trips."
AS’s comment that this “was really none of his concern” IS concerning. AS’s comment leaves the impression that an employee of the probation department trying to gather information for the COURT is not capable of doing his job, whereas AS sounds like he is playing the entitled card as an attorney. IDK, but the sound bite doesn’t play well.
And, clearly with the activity in Avon that particular day, it would behoove the probation department to question why MT was in Farmington, hopefully not near the FD properties.
Speaking of FD properties, I’ve been playing with who could have removed the contents of the safety deposit box at the bank in Farmington. One character that had not entered my list of possibilities is MT, until I read the above. She had been residing with FD in Farmington for at least 2 years. Supposedly she worked in the office with him. It is certainly not outside the realm of possibilities that she could have been the joint signee on the safety deposit box. Perhaps the second key could have been removed during one of her two earlier moves from 4JX in October 2019.
Back to the most recent filing….AS says:
“.
The defendant, now 45, is a United States citizen with no prior criminal record. She lived and worked in the Hartford area with her adolescent child since 2017. Prior to that, she lived in Miami, Florida, where her father, mother and sister maintain residences, and where she maintained employment. She is an accomplished competitive athlete who has won several sports medals in national and international competitions. Her mother has moved here to reside to help out due to her current legal difficulties.”
Won’t belabor this sketchy employment record, but I would like to point out that I have no idea what she did as a FORE Group employee nor her actual salary….she did write some ads for The Patch, clean windows and bathrooms….maybe…and shower with the boss. Other than that, her job description is nebulous. I don’t remember reading what “employment” she had in Miami. She did help her sister open the shoe cover business, but I’m not sure what she did. Other than the employment very early in her career with therapeutic riding and her stint in Middle Estate promoting horse racing (what young woman would elect to go to the Middle East with the cultural bias against women?), I have no idea what her skill set is.
Now she has a new fabric business that her attorney can’t even describe.
A brief comment about her competitive athletic endeavors, both training and travel needs to be made. MT trained in a gym probably paid for by Farber money, and traveled to Greece and Spain to compete on Farber money also. She hasn’t paid her own way for these stellar endeavors, IMO.
From AS’s filing….”.
The defendant has developed strong friendships and community ties to the Hartford area over several years. She has her own business, and before the arrest was engaged in volunteer work with both nonprofit organizations and her daughter’s school.”
Prior to MT’s arrest her outside friendships were primarily confined to FD’s friends and her family. She had/has a close friend who is also from South America who happens to be in the design business. Her church and horse friends have multiplied since her arrests, but hardly strong ties to the community.
The only evidence of volunteer work at her daughter’s school was the donation made by her baby daddy to a fund raising auction in which “they” donated a stay at the ski resort in South America. (air fare not included)
And, finally, after citing various legal cases AS states:
”
The defendant asks for a broad interpretation of appellate rules permitted by PB §§ 60-1 and 60-3 here, because she has demonstrated good cause.”
Ah….here it is again…MT is a good girl and deserves to be rewarded because she hasn’t been too much trouble since her arrest….She just lied…nullified herself as a witness….continued to lie….refuses to candidly discuss her relationship with LE or the civil courts. She is absolutely an upstanding citizen according to her attorney.
However, would an upstanding citizen uproot her child and bring her into a contentious divorce? Not only expose her to this situation, but bring the child into the marital home as her boyfriend’s mother-in-law pays the mortgage? Would an upstanding citizen begin traveling with her child and this man as early as 2015 knowing he was married? Would she accompany him in cleaning the EE employee's truck, write an alibi script that contains falsehoods, refuse to talk to LE?
SMH…over and over and over again. I hope the Appellate Court quickly responds to AS’s motion reminding him that no one is above the law or the pandemic.
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=Gh5t07ARimMxT4eNVsUQVw==
IMO...MOO
..."BBM...perhaps even the entire hide of a cow???" Laughing, thanks for being here!
FST -CR20-0241179-T