CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, Media, Maps, Timeline, *NO DISCUSSION*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
@cathyrusson

BREAKING: Another juror is dismissed in #MichelleTroconis trial. Earlier in the trial an alternate juror was dismissed because he told one of the prosecutors, "We love you." This time a juror was talking about the case comparing it to "Gone Girl". Note, the case started with 5 alternate jurors so there are still 15 jurors left.


11:56 AM · Jan 19, 2024
 
@cathyrusson

ANOTHER JUROR was dismissed yesterday in CT v. #MichelleTroconis trial. The juror had an emergency and needed to leave the country. This makes 3 jurors dismissed since the beginning of trial. There are 2 alternates left. First juror told a prosecutor "we love you". Second juror referenced Gone Girl when discussing the case.

 

2/22/24

STAMFORD, CT — Though he was expected to testify, former attorney Kent Mawhinney did not take the stand for the prosecution during the Michelle Troconis trial in the Jennifer Farber Dulos disappearance and death case.

[..]

There is reportedly some confusion whether Mawhinney invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege by not testifying, though his attorney, Jeff Kestenband with Butler, Norris & Gold, told Patch, no.

"Kent Mawhinney has not invoked his Fifth Amendment right," Kestenband wrote in an email to Patch. "That is all I am willing to say on the record at this point."

The Stamford Advocate reported that Stamford Superior Court Judge Kevin Randolph, and Assistant State's Attorney Sean McGuinness, both seemed to indicate that Mawhinney invoked the privilege.
 

2/28/24

[..]

Prosecutor Sean McGuinness, in closing out nearly two hours of closing arguments in the case on Tuesday, laid out 30 examples that he said point to Troconis’ involvement in the disappearance of Jennifer Farber Dulos, asking the jury repeatedly: “Is it just a coincidence?”

[..]

The state spent 25 days building its case against Troconis, but closing arguments were the first time the jury heard them tie all that evidence together. In doing so, McGuinness called out 30 times when he said Troconis was knowingly involved in the crimes and cover-up despite the defense’s arguments that she just happened to be along for the ride, or just happened to pick up a call to Dulos’ phone that prosecutors say was prearranged.

Troconis and her defense team have maintained her innocence throughout the lengthy trial, arguing that the state’s case was built on “speculation, upon speculation, upon speculation.”

[..]

Pointing to a series of slides on a screen, McGuinness walked the jury through each of the so-called coincidences from May 2019 to June 2019, when she did her third interview with police:

“I want to just pose these questions to you as you head into your deliberations. Is it really just a bunch of coincidences?” McGuiness asked the jury.

These were the 30 things he asked them to consider as they deliberate:

1. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant answered Dulos’ phone at 4 Jefferson Crossing when he was murdering his wife in New Canaan?

2. Is it just a coincidence that Dulos’ phone was being moved and manipulated when only the defendant was home?

3. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant brought cleaning supplies to a property on 80 Mountain Spring Road where you know that the cleanup of Pawel Gumienny’s Toyota Tacoma was going on?

4. Is it just a coincidence that the call from Greece is not in the defendant’s timeline?

5. Is it just a coincidence that during the clean-up, only hours after Jennifer is murdered, the defendant is shuttling back and forth between 4 Jefferson (Crossing) and 80 Mountain Spring Road?

6. Is it just a coincidence that during these trips back and forth the defendant starts a fire at 4 Jefferson Crossing?

7. Is it just a coincidence that during these trips back and forth, the defendant starts a second fire at 4 Jefferson Crossing?

8. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant eventually lights a third fire at 4 Jefferson Crossing?

9. Is it just a coincidence that, while Dulos is cleaning the Tacoma, she takes a brown-stained paper towel from him and throws it in the trash?

10. Is it just a coincidence that despite no one telling her to, she took the keys to the Tacoma?

11. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant travels with Dulos to Hartford as he disposes of the evidence on the same day?

12. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant brought black garbage bags to 80 Mountain and Jennifer’s shirt and bra were found inside black trash bags?

13. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant brought a green and yellow sponge to 80 Mountain Spring Road and two of those were found in the trash in Hartford?

14. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant brought a broom and the police found a mop or broom handle in the trash at Albany Avenue in Hartford?

15. Is it just a coincidence the defendant opened the door to the Raptor at the exact moment that Dulos exited the vehicle to dump those license plates in the sewer and block that other vehicle’s view?

16. Is it just a coincidence that, despite her daughter not being home, the defendant panicked when the police came to the house, went to three separate rooms, and said “I don’t wanna be here?”

17. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant followed Fotis Dulos to the car wash and then tried to lie about it?

18. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant’s phone number, and not Dulos’ number, was used at the car wash?

19. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant lied and said she showered with Dulos when he was actually en route to murder his wife?

20. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant lied about seeing Dulos in the office, again while he was in New Canaan murdering his wife?

21. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant initially denied seeing Dulos’ phone on the morning that Jennifer was murdered?

22. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant said she saw Dulos meeting with Kent Mawhinney at 4 Jefferson Crossing around the time of Jennifer’s murder — the same information that was in Dulos’ timeline?

23. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant never mentioned starting a fire to the police until they confronted her in the third and final interview?

24. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant failed to mention that the Tacoma was at 80 Mountain Spring Road during her first two interviews?

25. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant never mentioned that Dulos had washed the Tacoma during her first two interviews?

26. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant answered the one call mentioned in Dulos’ timeline on that morning as having been answered by him on the morning of his wife’s murder?

27. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant failed to tell police that Fotis Dulos’ bicycle was at 80 Mountain Spring Rd. until the third and final interview?

28. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant lied about not going back to 80 Mountain Spring Road to return those keys?

29. Is it just a coincidence that Dulos told Pawel Gumienny to keep the defendant “out of this” when Gumienny brought up the defendant taking his keys?

30. Is it just a coincidence that the defendant’s DNA was found on the opening of a garbage bag that also contained blood stains, tape, and Jennifer Dulos’ DNA?

“Are all these things just coincidences or is the defendant guilty?” he asked after listing them all.

Throughout the trial and in his closing arguments, Schoenhorn addressed most of these things. He said that Troconis was in the car on Albany Avenue in Hartford, but that Troconis was not paying much attention to what Dulos was doing and thought they were just going to Starbucks.
 

3/1/2024

Michelle Troconis has been found guilty of conspiring to murder Jennifer Dulos in 2019 and five other counts.

A six-member jury returned its verdict Friday after more than two full days of deliberating.

Troconis sobbed as the guilty verdicts were announced Friday morning.

She was found guilty of the following charges:

  • Count 1: Conspriacy to commit murder
  • Count 2: Conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence (May 24, 2019 events)
  • Count 3: Tampering with physical evidence (May 24, 2019 events)
  • Count 4: Conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence (May 29, 2019 events)
  • Count 5: Tampering with physical evidence (May 29, 2019 events)
  • Count 6: Second-degree hindering prosecution
After the verdict was read, state prosecutors asked that Troconis' $2.6 million bond be revoked or raised.

The judge agreed to raise her bond to $6 million. If she makes bond, she will be required to wear an electronic monitoring device and will be subject to home confinement while she appeals the verdict.
 

3/6/24

A jury on Friday found Troconis guilty of six counts, including conspiracy to commit murder, in the death and disappearance of Jennifer Dulos, who hasn't been seen since May 24, 2019.

Troconis was charged Tuesday with contempt of court and will have a hearing on the matter on March 21. She remains held at York Correctional Institution in lieu of $6 million bail following her conviction and is scheduled to be sentenced on May 31.

[..]

A warrant obtained by Stamford prosecutors contends that during her two-month trial, Troconis on at least one occasion was looking at a sealed family psychological report on the Dulos family as Jennifer and Fotis Dulos were embroiled in a contentious two-year divorce and custody battle.

[..]

Inspector Christopher Gioielli, who investigated the allegations, reviewed video footage of the trial and confirmed Troconis had displayed portions of the sealed Dulos report on her computer screen.

The partial sentences seen on Troconis' computer that were captured on a screenshot by prosecutors "mirrored the language on page 50 of the sealed custodial report," the warrant said.

Troconis was present in the courtroom a few years ago when her attorney Jon Schoenhorn was told that only her defense team could view the report and that its contents were otherwise sealed from public view, including herself, the warrant stated.
 

Quotes from article:

"Less than a week after Michelle Troconis was found guilty on all charges in connection with the disappearance of Jennifer Farber Dulos, her lawyer has filed for a new trial and moved to have her acquitted".

"Troconis’ attorney, Jon Schoenhorn, filed two motions in Stamford Superior Court on Thursday: A motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment of acquittal post verdict".

"The motions come just six days after Troconis was found guilty of conspiring with her former boyfriend Fotis Dulos to kill Farber Dulos, his estranged wife".

"In the new trial motion, Schoenhorn argues that Troconis’ constitutional rights were violated over the course of the seven-week trial".

"He wrote in the motion that prosecutors’ closing arguments “infected” the trial.

"Closing arguments, he said, “caused the trial to be so infected with unfairness as to constitute due process violations.”

"Specifically referencing parts of prosecutor Sean McGuinness’ rebuttal, Schoenhorn wrote that prosecutors “improperly engaged in speculation and made claims unsupported by evidence to suggest that random unrelated innocent acts were not a ‘coincidence’ and therefore constituted a course of nefarious conduct for which no actual evidence was presented.”

Next, Schoenhorn said the court erred by not allowing motions, sidebar conversations or objections when the Dulos children’s nanny testified about a call to the New Canaan Police Department in which she mentioned Dulos’ firearm ownership.

The motion goes on to list a number of other concerns, including allowing law enforcement officers to testify about “irrelevant and immaterial hearsay;” allowing witnesses to narrate, interpret and give opinions about certain video recordings; and allowing evidence of so-called presumptive or screening tests for the presence of blood to be admitted, which Schoenhorn repeatedly objected to throughout the trial.

"Schoenhorn also argued in the motion that the court denied Troconis her right to a speedy trial by holding jury selection three months before the trial’s start date. Troconis’ trial started on Jan. 11, with the prosecution presenting evidence for 25 days and the defense making their case for about 2 1/2 days".

"
Schoenhorn on Thursday also filed a motion for judgment of acquittal post-verdict, stating that “despite this finding, the verdict of guilty is not supported by sufficient evidence to sustain the state’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt on any of the six counts.”

"Schoenhorn argued that, even putting what he calls a lack of evidence aside, the state only presented evidence of a single conspiracy".

“Therefore subjecting the defendant to multiple convictions for this singular offense, violates double jeopardy and due process of law,” said Schoenhorn, who argued that Counts 2 and 4 — charges of conspiracy to tamper with evidence — should be dismissed".
 

Quotes from article:

"Courtroom video confirmed Michelle Troconis displayed a portion of a sealed Dulos family psychological report during her trial, according to a warrant for her arrest on a contempt of court charge".

"Troconis was charged Tuesday with contempt of court and will have a hearing on the matter on March 21. She remains held at York Correctional Institution in lieu of $6 million bail following her conviction and is scheduled to be sentenced on May 31".

"A warrant obtained by Stamford prosecutors contends that during her two-month trial, Troconis on at least one occasion was looking at a sealed family psychological report on the Dulos family as Jennifer and Fotis Dulos were embroiled in a contentious two-year divorce and custody battle".
 

3/1/24

Within just eight months, the children – who were ranging in age from 8-13 at the time – had lost both parents. They were taken in by their grandmother, Jennifer’s mother, Gloria Farber, who lived in New York City at the time.

Ms Farber was granted custody of all five children, which included two sets of twins, in November 2019. At the time, they were living on Fifth Avenue in New York City. A family statement released at the time stated that they were “safe and surrounded by love and support.”

Jennifer was last seen dropping off her children at the New Canaan Country Day School on 24 May 2019. She was reported missing later that day after she failed to show up for appointments and stopped returning calls and texts. Her 2017 Chevrolet Suburban was later found at a park near her home.

[..]

In August 2023, Ms Farber, now 88, filed a petition to the Darien-New Canaan Probate Court to declare Jennifer dead in order to protect the children, NBC Connecticut reported.

The Dulos children, now ranging in age from 13-17, have been in their grandmother’s care since the day of Jennifer’s disappearance.

Ms Farber’s attorney Richard Weinstein said in a statement this week that the petition was filed to protect the children.

“As long as Jennifer’s status was undecided, then the children could not inherit from her or from her mother,” he said.


“We were concerned, obviously, with Mrs. Farber being 88 years of age, needing to wait the seven years.”

According to Jennifer’s will, all of her assets will be left to the children now that she’s officially declared dead. The will was signed on 26 April 2017, two months before she filed for divorce from her husband Fotis.

At the time Jennifer went missing, Fotis was living with his girlfriend Michelle Troconis in Farmington.

Ms Troconis was accused of helping Fotis – her then-boyfriend – cover up the murder, with prosecutors saying surveillance footage captured the couple disposing of trash bags containing Jennifer’s blood and DNA.

She was charged with conspiracy to commit murder, tampering with physical evidence and hindering prosecution.

On 1 March, a jury found Ms Troconis guilty on all charges.
 
Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

ALSO HAPPENING NOW: A remote hearing for Michelle Troconis who remains at York Correctional Institution on a $6 million bond after a jury convicted her of six felonies including conspiracy to commit murder in the disappearance presumed death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
7:42 AM · Mar 14, 2024

We are still waiting for one attorney to log on and then will be begin.
@News12CT
7:45 AM · Mar 14, 2024

We are underway. Troconis has joined the remote hearing from York CI.
@News12CT
7:49 AM · Mar 14, 2024

The prosecution has filed a motion to modify the conditions of release for Troconis' bond because Troconis provided an address of Miami, FL, to probation should she post the $6 million bond.
@News12CT
7:53 AM · Mar 14, 2024

The state wants her confined to Connecticut if she posts. Assistant State's Attorney Elizabeth Moran says bail would not be able to properly monitor her in Florida.
@News12CT
7:55 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Defense attorney Jon Schoenhorn says he doesn't know why they're having this hearing, calling it "a waste of time." Schoenhorn says Judge Kevin Randolph was well aware that Troconis did not have an address in Connecticut because she no longer lived there.
@News12CT
7:57 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Schoenhorn points out Troconis' family isn't posting right now. He also says it's false that Troconis couldn't be monitored from FLseeing as she was on GPS monitoring while out on $2.1 million while awaiting trial. Schoenhorn states Troconis was always fully compliant.
@News12CT
8:00 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Schoenhorn also says the CT Supreme Court ruled over a year ago that if the state files a motion to modify bond release conditions, they have to provide evidence showing why that is necessary and why the current conditions aren't sufficient.
@News12CT
8:02 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Schoenhorn says that hasn't happened here. He also says he believes it's unconstitutional to add a condition that she find a place to live in Connecticut.
@News12CT
8:06 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Judge Gary White, who's presiding over the hearing, asks to hear from the bail commissioner. Shereen Webbley says they did monitor Troconis and her GPS ankle bracelet from Florida for years, but that wasn't home confinement as was ordered here.
@News12CT
8:10 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Webbley says they would be able to monitor her location there but said the current conditions wouldn't force her to bond out at court as the state wanted, she could bond out at Niantic.
@News12CT
8:20 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Schoenhorn says he wouldn't object to Troconis having to post bond at court. He's objecting to her having to remain in Connecticut, IF she can post. Schoenhorn says at the present time, that's not happening.
@News12CT
8:22 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Judge White rules the court has broad discretion and can modify the post-conviction conditions of release at any time. White says he's persuaded by the state's arguement and will grant the motion.
@News12CT
8:29 AM · Mar 14, 2024

White says Troconis will be subject to IPS [Intensive Probation Supervision] monitoring as well as GPS monitoring, must surrender all passports--even expired ones (Schoenhorn has her expired Venazuelan passport)--cannot leave the state of Connecticut, and must comply with house arrest.
@News12CT
8:32 AM · Mar 14, 2024

She also must post bond at the courthouse (which is mandatory with IPS monitoring) if she gets the means to do so.
@News12CT
8:32 AM · Mar 14, 2024

There is a brief clerical hearing in the case on Monday, March 18 for Judge Randolph to "say the magic words" and order the pre sentence investigation report. He apparently implied it on March 1, but it needs to be done on the record. Troconis won't be there.
@News12CT
8:38 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Thursday, March 21 is the date of her contempt hearing.
@News12CT
8:38 AM · Mar 14, 2024

Then both sides return on April 10 for the motions filed by Schoenhorn last week for acquittal and a new trial.
@News12CT
8:39 AM · Mar 14, 2024

We are done.
@News12CT
8:40 AM · Mar 14, 2024

@Niner
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
457
Total visitors
521

Forum statistics

Threads
608,149
Messages
18,235,301
Members
234,302
Latest member
TKMorgan
Back
Top