I'm not surprised. Megan has some interesting friends, doesn't she?
Since this thread is about Dane Greathouse....he was in court today and pleaded not guilty. He is back in court on March 6. His bond is set at $75,000.
Yes, and I know of a similar case in Ventura County California.I've never heard of a baby being taken as revenge for their parents' drug debt, but I have heard of a 15 yr old girl being abducted and murdered for exactly that reason. Unfortunately I can't remember the name, it was on an episode of the FBI Files.
Not saying that happened here, but its not as far fetched as some people seem to think it is.
Yes, and I know of a similar case in Ventura County California.
A 20 yr old had a big drug debt owed to his supplier, as he was dealing but got behind in the payments. The supplier went looking for him and couldn't find him, but saw his 15 yr old brother and took him and killed him instead. The killer was named 'Hollywood' something.
Do we actually know if she "gave" it to him, or did he just help himself?Why did she give her phone to someone she mutually dislikes?
Exactly! Just because that call didn't go through, doesn't mean it wasn't for him or anybody else connected to that phone. He was using the phone at that time for some reason and we don't know what that reason was.http://fox4kc.com/2012/02/20/figure-in-baby-lisa-case-arrested-in-northland-stabbing/
But Rugen said hes confirmed Greathouse was an irrelevant bystander.
Yes, he was using this phone, but Ive since been granted access to Megan Wrights cell records and that phone call never went through. There was no incoming phone call to that phone at 11:57 p.m., said Rugen.
I am less interested in the fact that the call did not make it through to MW's phone than the fact that someone ATTEMPTED to get through to MW's phone from one of the now missing phones in the wee hours.
Was the caller trying to reach MW or DG and why?
Not sure how the fact that the call never got through translates into DG being irrelevant or a bystander since it is still unknown who generatd the call, why or under what circumstance.
Do we actually know if she "gave" it to him, or did he just help himself?
Well I don't know anything but didn't she say that she left the phone and told the others to feel free to help themselves, or words to that effect?
Maybe I'm kinda odd and stingy but I probably wouldn't give anybody the freedom to use my phone unless they're really good friends of mine. Particularly if they're somewhat shady people. I'd be afraid they hit me with a huge phone bill or use it to some criminal activity that comes back to bite me later when the police comes asking questions.
Well I don't know anything but didn't she say that she left the phone and told the others to feel free to help themselves, or words to that effect?
Maybe I'm kinda odd and stingy but I probably wouldn't give anybody the freedom to use my phone unless they're really good friends of mine. Particularly if they're somewhat shady people. I'd be afraid they hit me with a huge phone bill or use it to some criminal activity that comes back to bite me later when the police comes asking questions.
We only have cell phones, 3 in our household, and all three are unlimited minutes. Do we know if Megan's phone had unlimited minutes or even Deborah's, for that matter?
Ya know Donjeta, as nice as MW seems to be, her behavior is highly suspect. She said seven different people were able to use her phone. I suspect she wanted to distance herself from that phone call. She lacks good judgement...and hangs out with the wrong people. I suspect she is into drugs and anything she says is to be taken with a grain of salt. Who lets anyone use their phone? She didn't even know where her phone was (she says) when the call came in...or she led us to believe that. She told us all seven people were allowed to use it. WTH? She missing more than one dot off her domino.!
She may be the drug contact in the neighborhood.
Maybe she has very good judgement.
Do you have reason to believe she has good judgement?
From what I've read and seen on video. No, none at all.
I must be misunderstanding your previous comment, then. Can you explain it for me?