You're misinterpreting the results Luch. the major component of the stains exclude the male Routiers but the minor component does not. The latest DNA tests from June 2015 confirm the male Routiers cannot be excluded from the minor component. The boys had seepage wounds, not spurting or bubbling wounds and as Val noted.
Frankly, and I believe I've told you this before, who cares what the federal judge called the prosecution's case? He more than anyone knows the prosecution has no burden to furnish or prove a motive and I am appalled that a judge of the court would make such a statement. If he believed the case was full of errors and holes why didn't he grant her a new trial? I think you should read those documents again. Why didn't Judge Ferguson grant her the nightshirt for testing instead of calling it a fishing expedition if he's so sure the state's case was full of holes and errors. A grandstanding statement by a judge means little to nothing.
The judge did say that. The judge cannot order a new trial, He3 said he can only rule on whether or not her rights were violated.
There is no blood on the nightshirt that has been PROVEN to be Darin's, Damon's, or Devon's. You keep believing Bevel's as an expert witness, and he has been PROVEN to be wrong in several cases.
You said there were 8 samples. I said there were over 30 samples. Just because there were later samples (please supply the link), why do you ignore the other 30+. I know, because it is not what you want to hear. You have her convicted, and even if she can be proven to be 100% innocent you will still seek to an execution for her. Why? You will never admit you could be wrong. All I know, is you cannot avoid getting blood on yourself when you stab someone with a knife.
All you are saying is that you cannot exclude Devon and Damon having left castoff blood. But, you cannot prove it is their blood.
Bevel will lie for a buck. And, that is exactly what he did. In court they said the screen material was found on the knife. After she was convicted it is now fingerprint dust and bot screen material.
You just will never accept that the prosecutions case may be totally wrong and rehearsed.
Me, I know the science of DNA (majored in genetics in college), and I know if you stab someone you cannot avoid getting blood from the knife to grip on yourself when you have deep stab wounds.
Please provide some evidence that says the blood on Darlie's nightshirt IS Devon's and/or Damon's. Oh wait, I know she took time to clean her nightshirt with bleach, placed it in the washer then placed it in the drier and then put in on and cut herself. This sounds a little like the prosecutions case against her.
Please give me one solid piece of evidence. and not an opinion of a paid witness that is enough to convict her.
According to darlie, she was getting wet towels for her husband. Not the right thing to do, but it is obvious she had no emergency aid knowledge.