DE - Dominion Voting Systems vs. Fox News, $1.6B Defamation Trial for 2020 election lies, 17 Apr 2023 *Settled $787m* + add’l trials

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
If Fox is allowed to settle without any explanation or apology for their actions, there is nothing to stop them from continuing on with their lies of all kinds since all they do is lie every day about all kinds of things.- I read they have enough money to pay 1.6 billion without really hurting their bottom line.
Dominion has no incentive to settle. The jury will decide how much to award. The jury that decided the defamation case filed against Alex Jones awarded the parents nearly $1 billion. Then Alex Jones mouthed off to one of the plaintiff attorneys and the judge ruled he has to also pay their attorney costs. And, the Supreme Court nixed his appeal. So, I'll continue to hold out hope that this lawsuit goes to trial. Alex Jones also insisted the 2020 Election was "stolen."

 
Fox paid for a full-page advertisement in The New York Times on Monday headlined “Trusted Now. More Than Ever.”

Fox paid for a full-page advertisement in The New York Times on Monday headlined “Trusted Now. More Than Ever.”

Are they completely delusional? :rolleyes:

JMO
 

You won’t see Fox News stars, or Rupert Murdoch, entering or exiting the courthouse for trial, it appears they’ll be hidden by a tent at a back entrance. (Video: News Nation)
Yet they are totally fine broadcasting to the world their terrible lies. They should be fine with being seen and defending what they have done, shouldn't they??
Spineless b-tards.
(sorry, not sorry)
 


The Fox ad cites YouGov as its source. The data from the survey, listed in the ad as being from “YouGov Profiles+,” don’t appear to be public. YouGov hasn’t responded to requests for the data, and a Mediaite story on the numbers from late last week doesn’t link to them. Asked for the data, Fox pointed to a press release last week that contained a chart featuring the same numbers but little detail.

But a mere look at the chart should give one pause. You’ll note that the numbers displayed add up to 148 percent. So this isn’t strictly about which one outlet is “most trusted.”

The description of the data in the ad, in fact, shows that the pollster asked about media outlets people watch and then “which do you most trust for news? Check as many as apply.” So 41 is the percentage of people who cited Fox as being among however many outlets they cited as being their most trusted.

You begin to see how this framing might make Fox look good. It is a go-to news source for conservative-leaning Americans, whereas left-leaning Americans split their choices among a number of other mainstream outlets.

This is about market share. And Fox has had the right-leaning portion of the market cornered for many years.
 
Tuesday, April 18th:
*Trial set to begin with Final Jury Selection (@ 9am ET) – DE – U.S. Dominion, Inc. vs Fox News Network, LLC is seeking $1.6 billion from Fox in a defamation suit over false allegations on the network that the company committed election fraud. Delaware Supreme Court (Wilmington)/New Castle County #N21C-03-257 EMD.
Jury Selection began on 4/13/23 & ended with 36 potential jurors. 12 jurors & 12 alternates will be selected on 4/17/23 before opening statements.
Trial set to begin on 4/17/23 (trial will run for 5- 6 weeks) with final jury selection (36 potential jurors) & then opening statements. Closed courtroom.

Case info from 10/6/22 thru 4/11/23 reference post #77 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...for-2020-election-lies-apr-2023.672547/page-4

4/12/23 Update: Judge Davis presiding over a defamation case against Fox News admonished its attorneys Wednesday for potentially withholding evidence & said he is inclined to order an independent review by a special master that could lead to sanctions. The move by Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis came amid a burst of fresh revelations in the case filed by Dominion Voting Systems against the conservative network & its parent company, Fox Corp. The judge expressed anger & frustration during a pretrial hearing after learning that Fox only recently turned over recordings of Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo talking with two lawyers for then-President Donald Trump, Sidney Powell & Rudy Giuliani. That came after the disclosure a day earlier that Fox lawyers had withheld critical information about the role company founder Rupert Murdoch, who is chairman of Fox Corp., played at Fox News. sanctioned FOX News for withholding evidence in the case. Also said he would consider appointing a special master to investigate the Fox legal teams' actions. The judge Wednesday ordered Fox attorneys to collect and preserve all internal communications regarding the matter. Earlier in the day, he denied Dominion’s request to hold separate trials based on the new information about Murdoch’s roles — one for Fox News and another for the network’s parent company. Jury selection begins on 4/13/23.
4/13/23 Thursday, Jury Selection Day 1: Jury selection is expected to last two days, with opening statements scheduled for Monday morning in Wilmington, Delaware. 4/13/23 Update: Jury selection began Thursday. Roughly 300 potential jurors were summoned to the Delaware Superior Court and will eventually be whittled down to a panel of 12 jurors and 12 alternates. Almost the entire process took place outside of public view, with Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis privately questioning prospective jurors. Davis said Thursday afternoon that he made good progress & that there were “more than enough jurors” to start the trial as planned on Monday, when opening statements are expected. Judge Davis told the attorneys Thursday afternoon that they had a sufficient pool of potential jurors (36) to finalize selection & that the court would finish the process by allowing attorneys their strikes Monday before opening statements. Attorneys for each side will have the opportunity to strike 6 potential jurors based on information the potential jurors included in intake forms starting Monday, 4/17/23.
4/14/23 Update: Fox News has formally apologized to the judge overseeing Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit after a late-stage admission revealing Rupert Murdoch's role as an officer at Fox News was addressed in court this week. In a letter submitted to the court on Friday, Fox attorney Blake Rohrbacher described the situation as a "misunderstanding" & said they "understand the Court's concerns, apologize & are committed to clear & full communication with the Court moving forward." The letter comes after Fox was sanctioned this week after Judge Eric Davis said they made misrepresentations to the court & delayed turning over evidence. Dominion's attorneys said that the network had concealed Murdoch's official role as an officer at Fox News until days before trial-- a late stage admission they said prevented them from obtaining more evidence regarding him. Judge Davis had said Fox had been "evasive," noting he had personally asked them about it during an earlier hearing & asked 'What do I do with attorneys that aren't straightforward with me?" Judge Davis said he would "most likely" appoint a special master to investigate whether representations by Fox made to the court as part of the case were "untrue or negligent." He also ordered Fox attorneys to preserve all communications related to the issue.
4/16/23 Update: Fox has made a late push to settle the dispute out of court. Fox News filed a motion late Sunday evening asking the judge to reconsider restrictions that he had placed on its case that would have barred Fox from using evidence that other parties, including former President Donald Trump, were making the same claims about Dominion that the network aired in its defense. In its lawsuit, Dominion originally had asked for $1.6 billion in damages. In its motion filed Sunday night, Fox said Dominion had knocked off more than half a billion dollars from that figure. The motion referred to an email Dominion lawyer Brian Farnon sent to Fox's legal team on Friday afternoon. "Dominion will not be presenting its claim for lost profits damages to the jury, given that it is duplicative of the lost enterprise value damages," Farnon said. Taken literally, the email suggests a honing of the case for the jury's consideration. It also served potentially as a message to Fox that Dominion might be receptive to negotiation talks at the eleventh hour. Dominion struck back against that notion later Monday morning. In a statement released through a spokesperson, Dominion said, "The damages claim remains. As Fox well knows, our damages exceed $1.6 billion." The judge announced on Monday morning that he was the one who decided to delay the Dominion vs. Fox News trial's start from Monday to Tuesday. He said he instructed jurors to return tomorrow morning. Judge Eric M. Davis told jurors in the Dominion v. Fox trial not to read any media coverage of the case. Judge Davis then held a brief sidebar conference with attorneys representing Fox & Dominion, with white noise playing over the court loudspeaker to obscure their conversation from the public. Trial with final jury selection starts on Tuesday, 4/18/23.
 

The Fox ad cites YouGov as its source. The data from the survey, listed in the ad as being from “YouGov Profiles+,” don’t appear to be public. YouGov hasn’t responded to requests for the data, and a Mediaite story on the numbers from late last week doesn’t link to them. Asked for the data, Fox pointed to a press release last week that contained a chart featuring the same numbers but little detail.

But a mere look at the chart should give one pause. You’ll note that the numbers displayed add up to 148 percent. So this isn’t strictly about which one outlet is “most trusted.”

The description of the data in the ad, in fact, shows that the pollster asked about media outlets people watch and then “which do you most trust for news? Check as many as apply.” So 41 is the percentage of people who cited Fox as being among however many outlets they cited as being their most trusted.

You begin to see how this framing might make Fox look good. It is a go-to news source for conservative-leaning Americans, whereas left-leaning Americans split their choices among a number of other mainstream outlets.

This is about market share. And Fox has had the right-leaning portion of the market cornered for many years.
Stephan Colbert's monologue tonight got a lot of laughs. He begged Dominion not to settle.

I still don't understand why "conservative-leaning Americans" would chose to receive information from a source known for lies. I'm a fiscal conservative but I abhor liars and most certainly would never vote for a politician known to be a liar.

JMO
 
Does anyone have the info for call in for audio?
…”The trial will not be televised. The only way Americans will be able to know what’s going on inside the courtroom—outside of getting one of the roughly 200 seats available in the courtroom—will be by calling into an audio line provided by the court.”

 
Does anyone have the info for call in for audio?
…”The trial will not be televised. The only way Americans will be able to know what’s going on inside the courtroom—outside of getting one of the roughly 200 seats available in the courtroom—will be by calling into an audio line provided by the court.”



The court, a state-government arm of Delaware, is making available a live video stream for reporters stationed in an overflow room, as well as a live audio feed that can be accessed via a telephone number. The audio line is "for the public and media to increase access to court proceedings," officials said.

The call-in line is a first for the court hosting the trial. The number hasn't been highly publicized by the state, though it can be found on the court's website. Davis and court officials have emphasized that any rebroadcast of the audio is strictly prohibited.

The public line is (774) 258-6500.

The Fox News trial is the first time that Delaware Superior Court has allowed audio of court proceedings to travel beyond the courtroom gallery.

 

Ex-Fox News producer Abby Grossberg said she recently found more evidence relevant to Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against her former employer and plans to turn it over to the court.

Grossberg, in the new affidavit, said a forensic expert recently pulled two recordings off the broken phone that she recorded using an app called Otter, which simultaneously records and creates text transcriptions of audio files. The recordings, which she details in the affidavit and audio of which was shared with NBC News, are of phone interviews she participated in with Bartiromo: one with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and another with two sources who claimed to know about Dominion voter fraud.

She said she used Otter in the normal course of her work as a producer. Recordings are saved in the Otter app, and they can also be shared.

Grossberg’s attorney, Gerry Filippatos, said the statement would be filed with the Delaware court as early as Tuesday, the day the trial is set to begin.

In a filing dated Monday, Fox lawyers added that while they had not known of Grossberg’s Otter recordings, they had shared some of Grossberg’s Otter transcripts found on email. The Giuliani transcript was shared with Dominion 10 months ago, they said.

Grossberg said that she recently asked a forensic expert to review the older phone and that the expert uncovered the recordings of the two interviews. Grossberg’s attorney shared the audio with NBC News.

The first recording, made on Nov. 7, 2020, according to Grossberg’s affidavit, was of a phone interview Bartiromo and Grossberg conducted with Cruz to discuss a planned broadcast appearance. Cruz is heard discussing voter fraud allegations — including an irregularity in Michigan, which uses Dominion machines in most counties — but stresses the need for facts and proof.

“It falls on the shoulders of the legal team that is bringing these cases to ascertain the facts. And it just can’t be, you know, someone tweeted this. It’s got to be demonstrable facts that can be laid out with evidence, because that’s what a court of law is gonna look to. Not just an allegation, but actual facts,” Cruz said on the recording. “And I hope when Rudy comes on the show tomorrow, he has some of those facts.”

Cruz did not respond to a request for comment.

Grossberg said in her affidavit that the second recording, made on Nov. 13, 2020, was of a background interview Grossberg and Bartiromo conducted with a banker named Doug Anderson, the CEO of Wall Street Capital Partners, and a male source who was granted anonymity to participate.

The men discuss conspiratorial claims about Dominion voting machines; Bartiromo promises to help “expose as much as we can,” while Grossberg presses for more information.

Anderson did not respond to a request for comment.
 
Fox paid for a full-page advertisement in The New York Times on Monday headlined “Trusted Now. More Than Ever.”

I’d trust my five year old to explain quantum theory to me more than I’d trust Fox News. MOO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
218
Guests online
328
Total visitors
546

Forum statistics

Threads
608,663
Messages
18,243,295
Members
234,411
Latest member
FineArt
Back
Top