Mason is basing his filing the motion on the fact the Orlando Sentinel petioned to have the files unsealed, claiming Ashton has revealed what was sealed in his book. And apparently, per Mason's motion, there was a not for profit stipulation that Ashton has violated. BBM
<snipped>
"In the latest motion, Mason acknowledged that he hasn't read Ashton's book, but references a motion filed by the Orlando Sentinel earlier this week, in which the news organization seeks to unseal those two key depositions.
"Mr. Ashton's violation of this Court's Order has now been used as a justification for a request to unseal materials that this Court has determined fits the legal criteria for nondisclosure," Mason's motion said.
"This Court issued a clear directive (
'sealed means sealed'). Mr. Ashton has now
violated this Order twice; once based on the flawed justification that somehow
revealing 'substantive information' from the depositions was not a violation of the Order. The second violation
was strictly for profit. Moreover, the continued dissemination of Mr. Ashton's book is an ongoing violation of this Court's Order."
<snipped>
Sentinel attorney Rachel Fugate argues in the motion that Ashton "authored a book in which he discussed the substance of the sealed depositions, which came from his memory and his notes."
"At this point in the proceedings, there is no basis to continue the sealing of these depositions," Fugate argues. "Any sealing order must be narrowly tailored to accomplish its purpose. A sealing order is no longer necessary to protect Ms. Anthony's fair trial rights."
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._danziger-and-weitz-casey-anthony-depositions