"Seem to" or "probably" is really all we can say, because we don't know the A's and have not actually seen it ourselves.
I will say, just one look at pictures around that house would suggest to anyone it was a more than suitable physical environment for a 2 year old. Casey has been described by most every one who was privy as a "good mother" who was concerned about the interests of her child up until Caylee went missing. Which ironically, is bonus points for the defense as far as proving any sort of prior neglect.
However, I'm sure more details of how Caylee spent her days with her mother will come out in court. It surely won't come from Casey herself though...![]()
I agree with you that the A's home seemed to be a more than adequate physical environment for Caylee. It seemed to me that all of her physical needs were being met, and she had plenty of toys, books and other items to keep her "stimulated". The fact that she may or may not have had alot of interaction with children her own age is not much of a factor for me. She was only 2. Now if she had been of school age - and not had any friends or social interaction, I would have found that very weird! But from what I can see - she had plenty of love, attention and affection from members of her family. Not to say that Casey may or may not have toted her around from place to place (perhaps even neglectfully), but she was loved by her family. JMO.