This.
I'm a perpetual fence sitter. I rarely bother to take a side, I just observe. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that until I have more information, my current thought is that their baby was actually taken by someone they knew, or who had been planning/stalking for awhile.
I can't really weigh my opinion by facts, because we have so few facts on the case. I sense there is much more information, and that could absolutely sway me. I can only account for my gut sense on this, because it's all we got, folks.
Primary factors in my impression:
- DB, by all accounts, (even her ex-inlaws) was a good mama.
- She was buying things for her daughter that night, and wasn't using it to prove anything or gain sympathy.
- Lisa was the baby girl after all boys. IMO the baby girl following two older boys is not the prime target for maternal aggression. I think a step child is always more at risk. And I don't buy into the idea that accidents would lead to dumping your loved child's body without a proper burial.
- I think DB is numb and not thinking through her every word, and that is getting her convicted in public opinion. So she stops talking and that is getting her convicted in public opinion. IMO a self indulgent killer would not be altered by public opinion, if anything I think they would get more indignant.
- Lisa hasn't been found close to home. If we are to assume the neighbors saw Lisa when they were over watching movies (likely, or DB would have said she went to sleep "early" because she was sick rather than 7:30) than we are to assume there was a rather small window of opportunity for either DB or JI to hide her body. IMO this would make it close to home, and the dogs wouldn't have struggled with a recent local death.
Post includes opinions and speculation :innocent: