How could the video show how the tape was when she died, when no one knows how it was when she died. No on knows this, not even JA. He thinks it's how she died, but he does not know. No I am not insinuating Kronk was involved, but you never know, he did know where the body was for 4 months. Who knows how many times he went back to check on his "find". His son said he called him around Thanksgiving and told him about it, yet he didn't report it again until mid-December?
I think the man who flipped off the camera you are talking about is CM. He was being harrassed as well as the rest of the DT daily by that obnoxious reporter..guess he got fed up.
I truly do not want to be argumentitive, I just can easily see how the jury came to their decision. I think a lot of the states evidence was very questionable. They did not use many of their own sherrif department investigators or FBI investigators, but went outside and found others, like Dr. Voss. When JB used the state and FBI people as his own witnesses, we found out why..because their findings did not coincide with the states theory so they left that evidence out and did not use them, instead finding a "research lab" rather than a FBI forensics lab (big difference).
I dont want to be argumentative either, Im sorry, I know I come off that way sometimes, and its not fair to you. It seems sometimes to me that you take something the SA did and see it as a negative, when it really isnt (at least to me.
JA explained the video was only to show that the tape was large enough to cover her mouth. He was clear on that. That fact, along with the other evidence presented, all point to it being put on her face. You blame them for some reason for going to the FBI and finding others, and I dont see why. They did not have a person like Dr Vass at Orange County, so they had to go outside. The FBI was involved early on, even the Anthony's wanted them involved, due to the fact it was a high profile case and there was talk about the child possibly being out of state, which Orange County had no jurisdiction over. The SA knew early on that due to the high profile nature of the case, the best lawyers and experts in the country would be available to the defense, just like Dr. Spitz, Linda Kenney Baden, etc. They thought the case would be more solid if they found the best of the best, like Dr. G and the FBI crime lab, so that the defense couldnt argue incompetency. Also, the defense alleged early on that Orange County had some vendetta against Casey, so the SA probably thought that using the FBI crime lab and others would show that the evidence is what it is, and its not just a case of Orange County and Lawson Lamar trying to "kill an innocent woman".
Again, if I am wrong please tell me so, but it seems like you look at everything through the lens of someone who does not trust law enforcement. I have had horrible experiences with the police, but I don't assume that all law enforcement is bad or corrupt. Maybe I am misjudging you, so please dont take it personally, just let me know Im wrong and I will take your word for it. Like I said, it just seems like you assume the worst of whatever law enforcement does, but yet are able to excuse any questionable behavior by the defense or defendant.
I would bet no one has.