krkrjx
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
- Joined
- May 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,279
- Reaction score
- 44,551
IMO, JSS was a paragon of virtue throughout this case. Yes, her voice broke when she declared a mistrial in the first penalty phase, perhaps betraying her true feelings. But other than that one moment, she was stalwart throughout both trials.
I was so happy that Samantha took the last few moments of her victim impact statement to acknowledge Judge Stephens, the toll this trial must have taken on her, and the fact that Jodi did her best to manipulate Her Honor's court. Samantha didn't lower herself to Jodi's mean-spirited vitriol, instead, she elevated the discourse by taking the high road, which is where Judge Stephens had been all along.
I'm pretty sure Judge Stephens thought Jodi deserved the death penalty, but I have the utmost respect for her for putting her personal judgments aside and doing her best to ensure that the trial played out according to the law.
ETA:
Am I the only one who thinks Judge Stephens seems like a super nice person? Can you imagine family get-togethers with her? Everyone would be so polite and well-mannered in her presence. Ahhh, I can almost feel the negative energy evaporating as she enters the room...
I would not want Judge Stephens presiding over a trial of the murderer of my love one. Nope. I would want a judge that would take better charge of the courtroom and move things along but, most importantly, not allow my loved one's memory to be maligned.
On the other hand, I would love to have Judge Stephens as a close friend or family member. I bet she is a wonderful person, easy-going, caring and considerate. I believe she would be sensitive and would weigh her words before speaking even in an informal setting. Most of all, I think she would just be fun to be around and probably has a great sense of humor.