DEPUTYDAWG
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,844
- Reaction score
- 13
I'm like someone else...help me put the tweets from her into context please?
Monday and ???
Monday and ???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw Dr Drew yesterday when Marc was on and saw that. I dont think Marc knew the extent of what was being alleged at that point. He did go overboard without doing enough research.
I think he assumed people were just in an uproar just because the juror voted differently. But it was much more than that and I dont think he did enough research before the Dr. Drew show.
Hes usually pretty fair and Ive come to like him but yesterday I think he was guilty of not researching enough before the Dr. Drew show. It will be interesting if he changes his tune if he is on tonight.
I understand your point, but don't agree that the juror owes anyone an explanation. Not the other jurors and NOT us. Perhaps it was not #17 who would not deliberate, but the others who did not want to really hear what she had to say. the other jurors do not have any right, IMO, to degrade and insult the decision of another juror.I am not sure that I understand your point. I have not heard anyway say that she should just "get on board". Instead, I hear "please explain your stance to us"
Ideally, of course. But that is assuming the entire jury is actually actively deliberating in good faith.It is also IMO the vehemence spewed against the decision of the jury is no less abhorrent as those at the JAII site. What's the difference?
The jury is a WHOLE body in it's final decision.
OK .. well it's probably safe to say it then .. the Juror's profile pic from her now deleted Twitter account (she took it down yesterday) was a little quote that said 'Monday you *advertiser censored*' ..
I don't understand. If it took the internet 10 minutes to find this stuff out about juror 17 how did the prosecution team miss it for 5 months? Not knocking them I mean I fully support them but it didn't take much digging to find out, change of name or 15 years ago dont they look into this. And if not why not? Surely they knew this already. If they didn't they should have and again not bashing the prosecution just wondering how this was missed.
It is also IMO the vehemence spewed against the decision of the jury is no less abhorrent as those at the JAII site. What's the difference?
The jury is a WHOLE body in it's final decision.
Jodi's sister, Angela, said the verdict would be on Monday...
It is also IMO the vehemence spewed against the decision of the jury is no less abhorrent as those at the JAII site. What's the difference?
The jury is a WHOLE body in it's final decision.
Joe Arpaio ‏@RealSheriffJoe 22m22 minutes ago
Trying to put a stop to #jodiarias social media antics which she conducts from jail. May hit legal road block.
https://twitter.com/RealSheriffJoe/status/573946170877194240
hmmmmm wonder what that means?
BBM: But it's quite obvious now that she did have "ill feelings" -- especially towards Juan !
:gaah::gaah::gaah:
Jodi's sister, Angela, said the verdict would be on Monday...
Not being snarky to you Jojo as you bring up a very good point but maybe the fact that the defense team had unlimited funds,which equals resources, while the state did not--Mr. Montgomery's full disclosure during his press conference yesterday that the State spent a mere pittance, approximately $132,000, of the nearly $3 million of taxpayer money that was spent during all of the trials. Essentially the DT billed the state for $2.7 million.