One of the pics look like she has a phone up to her ear so must be taken at jail house, don't think she has a phone in jail.
Moo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ETA: (I zoomed in to look....)
It looks like she's actually holding a stack of photos (?or (post)cards?) to me. Maybe even drawings? They appear to all be approximately the same size. Look at the bottom of the pile. I could be wrong.....
Everything about what this image represents is completely infuriating to me - and terrifying. Her manipulation knows no bounds.
:scared:
:furious:
:thud:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
you know i get that...angry yep I would have been too...but at the end of the day (and I hate to sound like Bill Clinton) but sort of depends on what you mean by "deliberate"...she probably feels she told them how she feels and that is her deliberation...I'm not saying that is right but for those wanting them to go after her...not so sure anyone can prove what was said behind those doors. I believe the husband said she felt "bullied" or something to that effect...I guarantee you she has her own accounting and someday in the future we will hear it.
ETA: (I zoomed in to look....)
It looks like she's actually holding a stack of photos (?or (post)cards?) to me. Maybe even drawings? They appear to all be approximately the same size. Look at the bottom of the pile. I could be wrong.....
Everything about what this image represents is completely infuriating to me - and terrifying. Her manipulation knows no bounds.
:scared:
:furious:
:thud:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't let it get to you Kimmie. She is crazy. And she wants to taunt people.
ETA: (I zoomed in to look....)
It looks like she's actually holding a stack of photos (?or (post)cards?) to me. Maybe even drawings? They appear to all be approximately the same size. Look at the bottom of the pile. I could be wrong.....
Everything about what this image represents is completely infuriating to me - and terrifying. Her manipulation knows no bounds.
:scared:
:furious:
:thud:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks - She may be taking selfies then.........
When they make phone calls from jail/prison, those calls have to be on the prison's landline, right?
Thanks - She may be taking selfies then.........
When they make phone calls from jail/prison, those calls have to be on the prison's landline, right?
Boy, we sure aren't hearing or seeing much from MDLR right now are we ?............I wonder how she's doing........
She got really quiet and quit boasting, sometime late Thursday and into Friday. Not a peep over the weekend. I wonder why that is ?
I am right with you.
I don't think we will ever see either notes to the Judge.
This is JMOO, I have thought a lot about this and talked with some other people with opinions. JMoo, The note the 11 jurors sent her must have been powerful and I'm sure told of their frustrations. I believe, again jmoo, Juror 17's note was also powerful. Listening to the video (below) is troubling for me because the lady juror is saying she had to apologize several times. JMOO Juror 17 felt threatened or intimidated and probably stated so in her note. Depending on what was said in the notes, more than one juror might have been released had JSS talked to each individually. Having to apologize more than once isn't something that should have happened. I understand they wanted to come to a unanimous decision and it was frustrating. The lady juror said she was pretty much for death upon going into deliberation. #17 was for life going into deliberation. When you are on a jury, what ever your decision should be respected. I don't know if #17 was stealth, or had an agenda, but that is only a problem after the fact. One thing also that is my opinion, asking #17 to tell them what situation would you give death, why would you answer. #17 didn't believe it applied in this trial, why would she have to explain to that extent. I'm not taking up for #17, just looking at both sides. I wasn't there but it is my opinion, from the interview and how JSS said they had a issue that would take more than an hour the deliberations went from bad to worse. JMOO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9MUb3-IwCE
I believe the husband used the word "assaulted". I personally would reserve that word for what happened to Travis. This juror may have felt coerced or unjustly persuaded but I think the word assaulted is inappropriate here, just my opinion. I'd be interested in hearing her account as long as she isn't getting paid to tell it.
OMG....nightmares!!
I was referring toYou mean like how TH did some fancy backstepping in his tweets about what she'd said to him on March 6,2015, even though he was the one that had used quotes for what she'd said?
Troy Hayden @troyhaydenfox10 · 17m 17 minutes ago 3:48pm March 6,2015.
To clarify: Willmott said both sides knew #juror17's 1st husband had "a past." But says she did not know Juan Martinez prosecuted case.
Troy Hayden @troyhaydenfox10 · 47m 47 minutes ago
#jodiarias def atty Jennifer Willmott told me she did not know #juror17's husband was prosecuted by Juan Martinez. #Fox10Phoenix
Troy Hayden @troyhaydenfox10 · 1h 1 hour ago
#jodiarias atty Jennifer Willmott, "We all knew (#Juror17's) 1st husband had a past. If Juan didn't check it out, that's his fault."