DNA Facts???
- Thread starter Barbara
- Start date
Nuisanceposter
Remembering Little Miss Christmas
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 24
LOL! That sooooooooooo does not surprise me. Did she happen to provide a link backing up her statement? You know what a stickler for links dear ol Breezy is...nothing but LIES unless you have one.Solace said:
No, but Joy is behiind her 100%.Nuisanceposter said:
So they have two markers that match and that is what they are going on. I would be money on that. And Ollie Gray, I believe we are talking about, is as pro Ramsey as it gets. He beats Breezy.
I wouldn't put much stock in this show, VOLKST. The same "expert" who said that was outed as a fraud in court last week.
madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 88
oh my Lord :facepalm:
whats going to be the next IDI show shocker
oh wait....Helgoth is hispanic!
The most significant revelation about the DNA, in my opinion and if it's true, is that they found the same unknown male DNA in two spots (her pj bottoms and underwear). I don't think I had ever heard that before. If true, that makes it hard to dismiss in my opinion (I've always found the DNA evidence to be pretty specious).
Walker007
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 594
- Reaction score
- 59
They also said there was a mixture of DNA in the blood spot in her underwear which if you look to the Making A Murderer Case to compare for a moment. The blood they found in the vehicle, there was no mixture and experts have argued that almost if never see that. So, I find it interesting there is a mixture. JMO.
questfortrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,005
- Reaction score
- 134
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Theres so much more to the tDNA information than viewers received on the program. I promise youll be hearing more myths about this DNA on additional programs designed to further cloud the issue of whether the Rs were involved.
According to the published reports, there were 5 different male samples of DNA found on JonBenéts body - on the wrist binding, on the garrote, underneath her nails and on the leggings/panties. (A sixth sample of DNA underneath JonBenéts nails belonged to a female, and the tests couldnt determine if JonBenét was perhaps the source of it.)
The quality of the panties/leggings tDNA is never revealed just for starters on this subject. The DAs manager of the tDNA process was a young man from the DAs office who gave Kolar the information about the strength of the other foreign tDNA found on the wrist bindings and on the garrote. If the tDNA is significant, why would the DAs assistant refuse to reveal how many markers the tDNA on the panties and the leggings possessed? How weak and degraded it was? Why, when so many other reports have been released, is that one tDNA report never spoken of in detail? Imo, it was being used to exonerate the people the DA ML referenced as her friends: The R family.
Those from Websleuths and Forums for Justice whove investigated the discussion of the tDNA have found that many, even professionals seen on the program last night, do not have the full picture of this tDNA. The DNA which was uploaded into CODIS, was from a mixed sample with dropout. (It was mixed with JonBenéts blood.) According to Dan Krane, a national expert on DNA, because they cannot attach a statistical weight to a mixed sample of DNA with dropout, it could never be used in court as evidence against a contributor. It can only be used as an investigatory tool. He quipped one time about even its usefulness as an investigatory tool, and Im paraphrasing: Well the same could be said about using a Ouija board to look for a perpetrator.
s(he) be(lie)ve(d)
Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 12
http://www.eonline.com/uk/videos/251986/inside-jonbenet-s-dna-testing
This shows the list of things tested for DNA. Including the white blanket.
This shows the list of things tested for DNA. Including the white blanket.
Attachments
panty with blood stain, sample removed:
Attachments
observation
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,388
- Reaction score
- 34
So this is an actual picture of the size 12's?? Back in the late 90's I bet nothing was preserved for future testing- as it looks like those Wednesday panties are brand new from the packaging and were never stained with blood.
Thanks for sharing Tad- you often have excellent resources.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 88
hmmmm...so JR and PR listed as suspects but BR not
madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 88
so now we have blood all over the scene, even if it's not much it tells us that it's probably hers.so she bled at some point.and we know she was wiped off with something down there.it makes my head explode cause I don't believe the Ramseys left the house to remove evidence.so the cloth, towel or whatever it was , was still in the house somewhere.so were the other panties if she was redressed....God I wish there were dogs at the scene!!they probably would have done a so much BETTER job than those cops:doh:
A DOG would have solved this crime day ONE.By finding that damn cloth.Maddening!BBL am ticked of again.
A DOG would have solved this crime day ONE.By finding that damn cloth.Maddening!BBL am ticked of again.