K777angel
Member
Toth said:Dna from under the fingernails had less than a full set of markers; dna from the original test on the blood spot in the panties had less than a full set of markers.
The two sets had markers that were in common and no markers that excluded the two as being from the same contributor.
I understand that it only takes one "different" marker to eliminate another DNA sample as a match.
If neither of these samples had complete sets of markers in order to compare them not only to each other - but to ANYONE - how can you claim that someone was either excluded or included as the donor??
That is what I believe Dr. Lee and others have been saying all along is the inherent problem here. No?