There is no evidence the Ramseys ever had a stun gun in their possession.
There is no evidence that proves a stun gun was even used in this crime. The same evidence which a few misguided people point to as proving a stun gun was involved, also proves a meat-fork was involved. All we need is a different delusion old man with meat-forks on the brain, and a different publicity seeking coroner, and we now have the "Meat Fork Theory" as being proven fact!
The other evidence in the case--pubic hair on the blanket, cord & black duct tape not originating with the Ramseys,
More evidence which proves nothing. The Ramseys themselves told LE that dozens of people had been in their bedrooms, providing unlimited sources for the hair (which you knowingly spun into being "pubic" when you know it wasn't.)
The cord and tape was sold at the Ramseys favorite hardware store, with Ramsey receipts found that contained the same sale amounts as those items. That provides a direct link between the Ramseys and those items.
Lack of history or pathology to implicate the Ramseys.
Dozens of cases exist where people with no prior pathology committed murders. That arguement is null and void. In fact, the Ramsey behaviour AFTER the crime is enough to convince the average person that these people are not normal by any defination of the word.
The ability for an intruder to enter the house without forcing entry.
The Ramseys had, by most estimates, around 6 hours to stage the crime scene. Unlocking a few doors and windows wouldn't have been very much of an effort for them. In fact, providing an entry point for their soon-to-be intruder would have been the easiest thing they did that night.
The handwriting on the ransom note, etc--point toward someone other than a Ramsey as the killer.
Completely wrong. The handwriting proves Patsy wrote the note. Anyone can see that for themselves just by viewing the PDF file in my signiture. The chances that any stranger would have so many exemplars that match the mother in a house he broke into to murder a child are impossible. A person would have a greater chance of being hit by lightening in 12 consecutive thunderstorms then that ever happening.
Combined to male DNA that does not match a Ramsey
DNA which not only didn't match a Ramsey, it will never match ANYONE. The DNA in this case not only doesn't have an identifiable source, it might not even exist and just may be an illusion created by the testing process.
As you can see LP, when you take a REAL look at the facts in this case, the intruder theory amounts to nothing but fantasy and a few creative pipe dreams.
