Nuisanceposter
Remembering Little Miss Christmas
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 23
Oh, okay. I see what you mean.
I think it can be inferred that from Jayelles' 'size 12 panties remodelled' experiment that no way would JonBenet have worn panties that large to the Whites' party.tumble said:I don't think so, I mean the detailed history of the object. She could have been wearing them at the Whites.
She could have been to the toilet at her home wearing those panties Christmas eve.
She could have had DNA on her fingers that was transfered to the panties Christmas eve.
Also included is the history of the object before it was packed ie which factory worker that actually handled them.
I heard someone saying that the fingernail DNA and the panties DNA matched. Is this right? Or just more misinformation.SuperDave said:"(didn't Dr. Lee purchase panties like that and also discovered foreign DNA on them?)"
Yes, he did.
On top of that it can even be so that those markers come from a composite of DNA. LE has indicated that the fingernail DNA actually is of little use.justice2 said:Only 2! Geeze.
Wow. Why wouldn't the actual investigators insist on getting the bag from them. Seems like it is a very important piece of evidence.SuperDave said:"If the type of underwear she was wearing came from a plastic bag were the rest of the underwear still in the bag? Do they know if PR opened it or was it wiped free of prints?"
Patsy said in 2000 that her PIs had the bag and that several pairs were in it.
BUT, last night, those PI's said they didn't KNOW A THING about the underwear! I don't trust them as far as I can throw 'em!
With advances in the collection of DNA, they were much later able to obtain a good sample of the DNA, and it now resides in the CODIS database.HollywoodBound said:Very interesting article. I guess the foreign DNA mixed in with JBR's blood could actually be from the instrument used to remove the sample from the clothing and under her fingernail.