Jayelles
New Member
Bluecrab, we have had this discussion several times. I HAVE checked the measurements myself - with numerous controls in place.BlueCrab said:Jayelles,
The measurements match perfectly. Please google the autopsy photos and measure for yourself.
It measures 3.6 cm centerline to centerline between the twin rectangular marks on JonBenet.
It measures 3.6 cm centerline to centerline between the twin rectangular electrodes on the Taser brand stun gun.
In regard to the slight misalignment of the marks on JonBenet, please remember that the skin on the test pig was thick and rigid; while the skin on JonBenet was thin and pliable. Jam a stun gun into the respective skins and the resulting "signatures" will look slightly different in regard to alignment. Using a model stun gun with metal electrodes the same size as a Taser, in an experiment several years ago I proved how easy it is to cause misalignment of stun gun marks on my own arm. I shared the results of the experiment here on WS.
IMO the evidence of a stun gun having been used on JonBenet is overwhelming.
BlueCrab
I bought a steel Stanley ruler - which has the British Weights and Measures Standards stampt - meaning that it is accurate. I then enlarged the photos of the pigmarks and the marks on JonBenet until the autopsy rulers matched the steel ruler on both axes on a printout.
Then I printed the images out on OHP acetate and overlaid them.
They do NOT match. The marks on Jonbenet are smaller and closer together than the marks on the pig.
The pig marks match the distance between the stungun prongs.
The marks on Jonbenet do not.
Anyone still wishing to pursue the Taser theory must also explain the differences between the marks on Jonbenet and the pig.
This was a replication of Cutter's research - mine took it further though in that I did not rely on measuring between the marks. I focused on getting the rulers to match and then overlaying the images of the marks.
Incidentally, I was approached and asked for a copy of my experiment by someone we've all heard of in connection with the investigation.
Also - the marks don't even look alike. The pig marks look like little burns and the marks on jonbenet are darker and more bruise like (much more like the marks on Gerald Boggs after he'd been dead for 6 months). I conceded that we didn't really know what would hapen to stungun marks if the victim died shortly afterwards and jameson said that Doberson's pig was slaughtered afterwards. She hinted that there were other photographs of the pig experiment which look much more like the marks on Jonbenet (scratching my head ..... SO WHY NOT PUBLISH THOSE?)
Also - the image which jameson has published on her website comparing the two sets of marks is doctored and it looks as though the marks ARE identical in size and distance. Note however that the image of Jonbenet's marks has the rulers cropped out of it. I also did an experiment showing that jameson's graphic of Jonbenet was enlarged for the comparison with the pig marks.