Do you think Amanda Knox is GUILTY? **LIST ONLY NO DISCUSSION**

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Do you think Amanda Knox is guilty?

  • Yes

    Votes: 267 33.9%
  • No

    Votes: 372 47.3%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 148 18.8%

  • Total voters
    787
Status
Not open for further replies.

UM&AMWfan

Former Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
374
Reaction score
17
I didn't see a poll in the Kercher murder/Knox appeal thread so I started one.

Let me start by saying YES!!
 
I did until recently but no longer do. I've read every forum, followed every link for those seeking to justify their positions on Amanda's guilt and or innocence. I found that most of the evidence that persuaded me to convict her was based on "mistruths" and rumour. The evidence in my opinion is not enough to convict her of murder if you are able to detach yourself from the unusual behaviour she displayed (carthwheels, etc.) when she should have been devasted at the loss of her roommate and friend.
 
I do not nor have i ever thought that ak or rs is guilty....i believe the one and only killer of meredith is rg.

I do not think the evidence was handled properly and i believe the ile was biased from the beginning. No way would any of us want one of our loved ones on trial for their life and the main prosecutor being indicted himself.....are you serious??

Dont get me wrong, this isnt a slam against italians.....i'm italian but this case has some seriously troubling errors and i only pray that ak and rs are freed and that meredith is able to rest in peace knowing her murderer was given a reduced sentence for his lies.......
 
I think she's probably guilty of being there and her story about covering her ears is true. I don't think she 'participated' directly and I think she decided to help clean/cover-up simply to save face. She didn't want mommy & daddy to know she was on drugs and involved with these weirdos. Well, now the world knows. I think perhaps she had been extracted from other `situations`in her life and was so morally bankrupt that she thought mommy & daddy could just get her out of this one too.

I`m not overlooking the (problems with the) prosecutor`s reputation and the (lack) of crime scene preservation. This is why I voted ùnsure` because while I think AK is guilty of a cover-up, I don`t think the court and police have `clean hands`.
 
I think she's guilty too just from her demeanor. That means nothing and is only based on what I've seen in the media. I'd like to look her in the eyes !!!
 
I do believe she was involved.
As to what extent I simply don't know. Not that I necessarily believe prosecution side that she orchestrated it.
 
I live in Amanda's home area, and in these parts it's not popular to say you believe she is guilty. I do know that the Italian prosecutor of her first trial is a very strange man who is know to have flubbed many cases.

I don't think Amanda is guilty of participating in the murder. I think she's guilty of being a spoiled, thankless girl who was living it up big in a foreign country on other people's money. I think she failed to realize or care that she has lead a very privileged life, and it appears to me that her advantages have not meant much to her.

Her real guilt, I think, lies in engaging in a very self indulgent culture in which another person's life meant little. I think she drew in an element of people that put her and her room mate at risk. And then when her so-called 'friends' did their worst, she made no effort to help her room mate. She took a lot of risks, and her room mate paid the price.

But no one would dare say anything like that around here!
 
I think she was there, but she was too stoned to do anything but cover her ears.


.
 
I don't think she is guilty. What reason would she have had to leave her boyfriend's house and go directly there and kill Meredith?...in a sex game like the prosecution claims? That's the best reason they could come up with? Besides, it is not very often that a woman kills someone by slashing their throat. That kind of brutality (stabbing and slashing) is usually committed by a man, not a woman. JMO
 
Deeply involved. Guilty. I am baffled at what might have gone down but I see how she can be "innocent".
 
Guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time and acting as those THINK she should .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
179
Total visitors
261

Forum statistics

Threads
608,632
Messages
18,242,689
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top