Drew Funneling Money To Steve

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I bet it plays out somewhere in the home equity loan scheme of things. I wonder if the company that gave him the equity loan took the deed as collateral? Is that how those home equity loans work?

That's my understanding from the below link. It clearly states by having an equity line of credit, that you are in danger of losing your home if you default. I doubt the Deed was laying around the house for Stacy to take. Which wouldn't do her any good anyways with the banks name on it.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/homeline/
 
I ONLY build my own PC's. Depending on how cheaply I can obtain components (usually through work), I can build a super fast, custom tailored machine for less than what you can buy in the store! Sorry to brag.... LOL

Since my hubby is a gamer, he HAS to have THE BEST system or he has a hissy fit. LOL :slap: So, his PC's are usually more expensive for me to build than mine or one that I'd build for a friend.

Well, good for you dee! I sure wish I had your smarts when it comes to computers. I don't think DP has a lot of money in computers. It appears that he only had the "basics" for his kids. What do you think?;)
 
You know I read that at Greta about Drew taking the kids to Disney over the holiday. But I also read at either Greta or findstacy that he was leaving the kids with a relative as soon school was out and he was going on vacation. Now that I might believe because Drew needs to have his lady friends around and right now I doubt that he has much opportunity for that. Also maybe he feels if he goes to another state or country no one will recognize him..so he might have a little more luck finding a friend..get lucky so to speak.
 
That's my understanding from the below link. It clearly states by having an equity line of credit, that you are in danger of losing your home if you default. I doubt the Deed was laying around the house for Stacy to take. Which wouldn't do her any good anyways with the banks name on it.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/homeline/

I know when we had a line of credit that you're not charged until you do write a check on the line of credit, but then the interest starts being charged too. So why pay interest to hide money from your wife.

Secondly you would need to show them as leins on the property..so there would be no clear deed to the house.

And third you also would need to contact your insurance company (homeowners) or they will contact you too..because they need to show that there is a lien on the house to this mortgage co. Consequently that even makes your homeowners insurance increase..the more debt yuo have the more the homeowners insur will cost you. So all in all that was not a wise financial move just to keep money from Stacy.
 
I stayed at the Animal Kingdom once and it would be considered a 4 star hotel, not cheap to be there during Christmas!
It was a pretty neat place to stay since there were all kinds of animals roaming around the grounds so the kids will enjoy it, to bad they can't enjoy it with their mom.

VB

Also, being the Disney freak that I am I know that Disney World fills up fast during the Christmas season - I wouldn't think you could get any reservations in a deluxe hotel for Christmas unless you booked MONTHS ago.

In fact, I just went and tried to get a room at the Animal Kingdom Lodge - it's full and I'm sure it has been for months.

hmmmmmmmmmmm.........like someone else said, I hope LE is watching him, something tells me he's planning on skipping out.
 
If LE didn't have a tail on him the first 3 days of his "vacation" right after Stacy's disappearance, I would hope they definitely track him now.

Can't they tell Drew he isn't allowed to leave the state since he has been identified as a suspect?
 
Maybe Mrs Drew number 5 is waiting in the wings for a Christmas affair of sorts. He can't flaunt her around BB or even Chcago for that matter..so maybe the kids with relatives are going to Disney and Drew and his lady friend are going somewhere else. Or maybe the lady friend is meeting Drew and his family there..anything is possible with this man.

Wouldn't surprise me if Dateline didn't hook him up with tickets or one of the other stations. Actually it sounds more like something Geraldo would do..maybe that was the payment for the exclusive interview he gave Geraldo?
 
If LE didn't have a tail on him the first 3 days of his "vacation" right after Stacy's disappearance, I would hope they definitely track him now.

Can't they tell Drew he isn't allowed to leave the state since he has been identified as a suspect?

Legally, could they stop him from getting on a plane if he's not been charged with anything? If he hopped a plane out of country, would they be able to stop it??
 
Legally, could they stop him from getting on a plane if he's not been charged with anything? If he hopped a plane out of country, would they be able to stop it??


If he still has his passport, I don't think they can stop him. I believe he's free to move about the country and to leave it if he pleases. JMO
 
Yes, in fact this was posted as a question last Sunday

Comment by Walt Ruch December 16th, 2007 at 10:36 pm
Can anyone confirm?

Is it true that Sgt. Peterson is taking the four kids to Disney World over Christmas, staying at the Walt Disney Animal Kingdom Lodge, leaving Chicago at 8:25 AM on 12/21 on American Airlines #1772 and returning on 12/27?

How interesting that there's so much detail given here. Either it's a bluff to see how many reporters flood the airport, or someone wants him watched!
 
Legally, could they stop him from getting on a plane if he's not been charged with anything? If he hopped a plane out of country, would they be able to stop it??

Remember, they were following Scott Peterson and were afraid that he was about to leave the country - this was AFTER the bodies had washed ashore but BEFORE the DNA results were back. And they did arrest him just hours before the results were back. I think that by the time he arrived at the jail back in Modesto that the results confirmed the bodies were Laci and Connor. So, they knew Scott's whereabouts and he was free to move about until the actual arrest.
 
How interesting that there's so much detail given here. Either it's a bluff to see how many reporters flood the airport, or someone wants him watched!
And that's about the very last thing anyone working at the airport wants on the busiest travel weekend of the year. I can't believe anyone published that whether it's a bluff or not! :eek:
 
Remember, they were following Scott Peterson and were afraid that he was about to leave the country - this was AFTER the bodies had washed ashore but BEFORE the DNA results were back. And they did arrest him just hours before the results were back. I think that by the time he arrived at the jail back in Modesto that the results confirmed the bodies were Laci and Connor. So, they knew Scott's whereabouts and he was free to move about until the actual arrest.

Scott was still in CA though. There will be multiple jurisdictions involved if/when he travels to FL. Who's in charge of watching him then? If they follow him at all....

Ugh, I feel so sorry for anyone that will be anywhere near him that week, if this is true.
 
panthera:

I can't believe anyone published that whether it's a bluff or not! :eek:

I agree!!! If it's true, the information should have been given to LE only. IMO, DP is being watched every second, but, people have GOT TO REMEMBER, there are kids who live with him and consider him to be their "Daddy" and they are not old enough to understand why "Mommy" is not with them. (Yes, we know, BUT THEY DON'T).

If DP wants to take them to Disney World, all that was necessary, was as I said before, the flight information only needed to go to the LE/FBI.

As much as I want DP behind bars, as long as he has the kids, their safety both mentally and physically are first. Again, REMEMBER they do not know what the majority of the world know. (that their father could have possibly taken both of their mothers away from them). Kathy and Stacy.

Anyone following the Janet Aruba thread?? Just as frustrating, as kids are involved there too.
 
Scott was still in CA though. There will be multiple jurisdictions involved if/when he travels to FL. Who's in charge of watching him then? If they follow him at all....

Ugh, I feel so sorry for anyone that will be anywhere near him that week,
if this is true.
Exactly, if it's true. That poster has posted some really 'off-the-wall' things over at GretaWire, so who knows if what he posted is fact.

I would hope that if it is true that perhaps DP's brother and sister in-law will be accompanying them.
 
Scott was still in CA though. There will be multiple jurisdictions involved if/when he travels to FL. Who's in charge of watching him then? If they follow him at all....

Ugh, I feel so sorry for anyone that will be anywhere near him that week, if this is true.

Yes, that's true about Scott still being in California. The only point I was trying to make was that Scott was free to roam about, even once the bodies had been found. I honestly don't know - any lawyers posting? - whether they could prevent him from travelling. He hasn't been charged with anything, and I have to say, it's a free country and I really don't they can prevent him from going. AND, I'm one who thinks he is guilty of both Kathleen's murder and Stacy's, but unless he is charged, he should be free to come and go as he pleases.
 
sleuther:

IMO, he is FREE to come and go. Which is why I wrote what I did up above.

With no charges against him, he is considered a free person. Now, I have heard in other cases, where they have stopped someone from leaving the jurisdiction if they feel that they are a flight risk. Only someone with knowledge in the law, would know the answer to this.

Is DP considered a flight risk? If so, can he be restricted to stay in the local area?
 
Exactly, if it's true. That poster has posted some really 'off-the-wall' things over at GretaWire, so who knows if what he posted is fact.

I would hope that if it is true that perhaps DP's brother and sister in-law will be accompanying them.


You responded to a post by TaxiMom who quoted my post.

I am going to have to take exception to your post as you seem to be saying that I posted some really 'off-the-wall' things over at GretaWire. I have NEVER posted at Greta Wire, and I do not say 'off-the-wall' things. Further, I'm not a "he" I'm a "she."
 
Exactly, if it's true. That poster has posted some really 'off-the-wall' things over at GretaWire, so who knows if what he posted is fact.

I would hope that if it is true that perhaps DP's brother and sister in-law will be accompanying them.

sleuther:

IMO, he is FREE to come and go. Which is why I wrote what I did up above.

With no charges against him, he is considered a free person. Now, I have heard in other cases, where they have stopped someone from leaving the jurisdiction if they feel that they are a flight risk. Only someone with knowledge in the law, would know the answer to this.

Is DP considered a flight risk? If so, can he be restricted to stay in the local area?


LittleDeer - I am simply not qualified to answer about the flight risk. I think I have heard that used when defendants are asking for bail and prosecutors are trying to get the judge to deny it. Also, when people are granted bail, sometimes they can't leave the state without permission, etc. But, I still think that in this case since he hasn't been charged with anything, that he can go to Disney World if he chooses. It would be interesting to know if LE considers him a flight risk. It would be pretty tough for a man with 4 kids to be on the run (chuckle), but I suppose with the older 2, he could just leave....
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
518
Total visitors
688

Forum statistics

Threads
608,124
Messages
18,235,022
Members
234,300
Latest member
lak1313
Back
Top