SStarr33
Inactive
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 7,881
- Reaction score
- 34
LOL, that is great. I think he opened up the doors of the ambulance too.
Interesting comment from Nancy Writebol from a recent interview:
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/eb...ancy-writebol-dont-let-fear-take-hold-n224861
What amazes me watching this private plane take this 1 patient away is the total irony that is shown by not making a simple and less costly (both money cost + lives being cost) decision to restrict travel for people traveling from those affected countries.
Instead we continue to risk future incidents and then we will jump through hoops and hire private jets to transfer all the patients around who get sick.
Why not try to nip this in the bud instead. I suppose that makes too much sense.
I dread to see what would happen when our health care systems get overloaded with many ebola patients. I seriously doubt there will be a private jet for everyone.
She doesn't want to spill the beans re: malaria. JMO JMO
From the way I am seeing it, the CDC is talking out of both sides of their mouth! Admittedly, they have made many mistakes and are learning as they go. Many of their procedures or protocols are not broken down into specifics.
The self monitoring, low risk does not send a warning that I am in much danger. So why should I consider not flying? After all, the hospital had nurses carrying for Duncan and other patients, it has been stated. How risky is this to those other patients? IMO, this would be an absolute no-brainer to those in charge! How and why did this serious flaw escape notice?
It bothers me that Nurse Vinson is getting such criticism. Was she and her co-workers told no flying directly? These days nothing should be left to be assumed! It must be stated in plain facts. Being she is the second nurse to come down with Ebola, something went wrong at the hospital.
My opinions only!
My opinions only!
THE countdown is officially on.The UN has warned the world has just 60 days to get Ebola under control, or face an “unprecedented situation for which we don’t have a plan”.
There isn't any time for that. Dupont makes some good chemical resistant suits, 3M makes some very good respirators (viruses are on the very very low end of the 3M respirator filter range). Both are in high demand from Joe Schmoe buyers and sales are WAY WAY up (the CDC labs surely use something better but those products are light years ahead of what most hospitals are using).
What would be wrong with having malaria?
IKR? And why he felt it necessary to specify he only "hugged and kissed nurses, and not doctors." Scratches my head
Her Ebola is more advanced than the 1st nurse.
From the way I am seeing it, the CDC is talking out of both sides of their mouth! Admittedly, they have made many mistakes and are learning as they go. Many of their procedures or protocols are not broken down into specifics.
The self monitoring, low risk does not send a warning that I am in much danger. So why should I consider not flying? After all, the hospital had nurses carrying for Duncan and other patients, it has been stated. How risky is this to those other patients? IMO, this would be an absolute no-brainer to those in charge! How and why did this serious flaw escape notice?
It bothers me that Nurse Vinson is getting such criticism. Was she and her co-workers told no flying directly? These days nothing should be left to be assumed! It must be stated in plain facts. Being she is the second nurse to come down with Ebola, something went wrong at the hospital.
My opinions only!
Her Ebola is more advanced than the 1st nurse.