sissi, please explain just how these things are actual, real evidence of any intruder.
sissi said:
oops..put this on the wrong thread..
evidence of an intruder.
Deliberate lies by those police involved the first few days.
Please quote specific "lies" and show how they are actually evidence of an intruder.
Example...when Fernie arrived ,he walked to the Butler door, saw the ransom note, noticed the door was ajar, walked around to another entrance and was let into the house. He questioned WHY if there were NO FOOTPRINTS in the snow as the police suggested, did no one see HIS?
Where did you see this? Please provide a source, or reference for this statement that you say John Fernie said. Not doubting you, but I've never seen anything like that.
another..Police hired a locksmith who noted tampering at the door, it was decided the tampering was "old", later it was found there had been no determination concerning the timing of the "tampering" it was simply noted as "finding marks indicating someone tried to tamper with the lock"
And just how is this evidence of anything other than there were marks on the door? It certainly looks like the BPD was looking for an intruder doesn't it?
The door, not just the lock, was marked and slivers/chips were missing, yet they weren't on the floor. That's why they thought the tampering had been a prior episode. If it were recent then where was the wood that was scraped from the door when it was tampered with?
Police released a statement, that John Ramsey said doors and windows were locked, however later it was found several windows were not locked and had wires coming in to connect outdoor decorations, and of course the butler door was not locked or closed.
Again, how exactly is this "evidence" of an intruder and where would one find that released statement? In his 1997 interview JR states that there was a misunderstanding when he scanned the police reports.
JR: Well, they was a couple of areas where I think there was some misunderstanding or wasnt correct. I did not check every door in the house the night before. I dont think I checked any door. I think I was tired, wanted to go to bed, get up early. Ah, and I think the other part I noted in there was they said I read to both kids before I went to bed, and that did not happened. What happened was the kids went to bed and then I read to myself in bed.
ST: John, let me ask you this. Do you attribute that to simply an officers error in recollection or might you have said that and . . .
JR: I wouldnt have said that. I think it might have been, maybe the way I said it, that was misinterpreted, but we clearly did not read to the kids that night. JonBenet was asleep, we wanted Burke to get to sleep, so we could get them up early the next morning, so . . .
Within the first few days the police released information stating as fact "no one could fit through that train room window" it was determined "too small".
I question WHY?
Please tell me which one of the actual press releases that is contained in. I find absolutely nothing in any of the official press releases that state this is true.
http://www.ci.boulder.co.us/comm/pressrelease/indexr.html
IMO the police came to the house and saw evidence of an intruder.
More..later as to the exculpatory evidence pointing away from the family.
None of this is exculpatory evidence of anything. You even state it is just your opinion. That is not evidence.
It looks as if there is no "evidence of an intruder" listed anywhere on this thread.
Factual evidence of an intruder is hard to prove in this case because it's so hard to find. Nothing listed is proof of an intruder.
Here, let me help you out a bit on what is actual evidence that cannot be sourced. However, just because they can't find the rest of it still does not prove these things were not already in the home and in the Ramsey's possesion.
How about the rope? No other rope like it was found in the home.
The black duct tape that was found over her mouth? Where did it come from and where is the rest of it?
The partial Hi-Tec boot print that has never been verified as belonging to anyone?
Those are "possible" evidence of an intruder, but not proof positive.