angelmom
The love stays...forever in our hearts
angelmom, not to dispute that there is a possibility that the detainees are following instructions, but doesn't the article mention that examines have verified abuse?
Trino, the "verification" comes from psychologists who have "confirmed" the trauma to these 11 men (out of how many detainees?). My problems are that a) the only admitted "torture" doesn't sound like what I call torture. See my post above. It sounds like jail. I have a hard time feeling sorry for them. Now in the case of people detained for no reason, then yes that is wrong. But it does happen, even here, and in other countries all the time. Does that make Bush a war criminal? Please.
b) there is absolutely no physical proof that any of the scars or damage took place once they were in custody b/c there are no medical records predating that. They only have the word of the detainees. Could they be lying? Maybe. al-Quaeda training teaches them to lie about torture b/c they know that the American media will eat it up and the American public cannot stomach it.
c) The torture that has been "confirmed" by a doctor is by a psychologist, who can only say that these men have PTSD. Again, who is to say that it isn't from previous events? Or that they aren't lying? We know that prisoners here in the US have faked mental illness to avoid justice, so why couldn't these men? And does having PTSD mean that they were tortured? I have heard of people having PTSD from bad car accidents and other traumatic events. It doesn't mean that they were tortured.
I really don't mean to make light of a serious subject, but to paint the entire military (and the president) with a broad brush b/c of this psychologist who has decided jail is unpleasant really makes me ill. Maybe he should do a tour and then reassess the situation.
They were tortured! Believe it!
Cheney and Bush do need to be tried for war crimes and then hanged!
Whatever! :hand:s