And just like you and so many of us have observed, the LEO's couldn't get past it -- from the time they walked into that house and looked around a bit & got the basic story, which was about all they'd get for a while, several LEO's just smelled something fishy. Even these LEO's who had had little to no experience with homicides felt that something was just "not right."
Further, to arrest the Ramsey's or anyone, the investigator(s) would have to write-up a good reason(s) for arresting someone. Apprehension of a suspect has to be based on probable cause (def.: "
Apparent facts discovered through logical inquiry that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed a crime, thereby warranting his or her prosecution,..." from
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/probable+cause) for an arrest -- and I think the very things we have discussed would have (should have) been sufficient to stand up to an official's standard for approving the arrest. A dead child, still in the home where she lived; her body was not found in a reasonable place and her body was not seen to be in a normal state for a natural death; the R's did not receive a call from the kidnappers; the RN was unusual; etc. Need I go on?
But the DA did not agree, ergo an approval for the application for an arrest warrant was not granted, and the request was not submitted.
And here we stand today. Same empty hands, and the only difference is that 17 years, almost to the day, have elapsed and we have had a drastic change in the personnel in the DA's office. We'll see what happens, and we stand by, hopeful but powerless.
:banghead: