Compassionate Reader
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,357
- Reaction score
- 114
I still don't totally discount this theory. When you say, "the injuries don't support this," can you elaborate how so? It seems like these injuries were caused by fists, a blunt-force object, and maybe a knife -- all of these can be utilized in any environment. Sometimes I feel like the "rebar" mark on SB's leg could have been caused in the back of a semi-truck trailer.
IMO, the injuries were caused by someone who knew the little boys. I don't think a random truck driver would have been this brutal in his attack. If the killer were a passing driver, I'd think that the bodies would have been either dumped in the Mississippi or taken to another city/state for disposal. Why would the truck driver/killer leave the bodies in that wooded area? He/she would have had a big tractor/trailer truck to use to transport the bodies. That reasoning, in addition to the nature of the attacks, is why I discount the truck driving killer theory.
Of course, I could be wrong. There could have been a psychotic truck driver on the loose at the time, but I believe, had that been the case, similar crimes would have been committed and discovered. So, unless such a psychotic truck driver had been around and had then either died or overcome his psychoses, I don't give credence to this theory any more.