Adrienne37
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2004
- Messages
- 3,262
- Reaction score
- 8
Arrest zimmerman now!!
respectfully snipped
I'm not African American but I can clearly see that it exists, and it still exists and this case reeks of it.
ETA: I do think it's great that there are so many non African Americans who are just as outraged.
JMHO
Zimmerman is very well protected by Fl self-defense law (despite what people who wrote it now say). If he is considered an aggressor, he would not be protected-but for that they would have to prove he is the one that started the fight. There are no witnesses as far as I can tell that can prove it one way or the other. And authorities don't seem to think that they can consider him following Trayvon an act of aggression in itself. So what exactly should be done in this situation?
respectfully snipped
I'm not African American but I can clearly see that it exists, and it still exists and this case reeks of it.
ETA: I do think it's great that there are so many non African Americans who are just as outraged.
JMHO
None of the witnesses can say with any degree of certainty which one of the two was screaming. And one of the witnesses (it was posted on the thread somewhere) seem to suggest it was in fact Zimmerman that was screaming.
I wonder if,
Since Trayvons family doesn't have the cell phone, which I believe,
The police claiming not to have it, which I don't really believe,
I wonder if, weird crazy idea, if GZ took it and still has it... I don't know how that would be possible, but whit all the incompetency, you never know....
Would be really interesting to watch the police car videos to see if GZ was even properly searched and how they handled the crime scene....
And yes my opinion only....
Micci
I don't know. I feel like right now we are on top of a powder keg that's about to explode.
I really think the less live feed of the protests, the better. I just see this exploding into a riot that would match the LA riots after the Rodney King verdict.
Zimmerman is very well protected by Fl self-defense law (despite what people who wrote it now say). If he is considered an aggressor, he would not be protected-but for that they would have to prove he is the one that started the fight. There are no witnesses as far as I can tell that can prove it one way or the other. And authorities don't seem to think that they can consider him following Trayvon an act of aggression in itself. So what exactly should be done in this situation?
Imo, Trayvon was killed because he was a black teen. I am sad and outraged because black males are at risk just because of their skin color. I am not black, but Trayvon was every mother's son walking along doing nothing wrong when approached by a man who may have been a sex offender or a robber or any of the people we warn our kids about. This case has angered the majority of people because Trayvon, every mothers child was killed based on his skin color. Yes, crimes are committed by blacks, but not all blacks commit crimes.
The majority of financial crimes are committed by white males. Should we assume they are
all suspect?
I have seen police community relations van driving around all day. I will not go to the rally because of safety concerns, but I will hold love and peace in my heart for this mother's boy and for all of our boys who are so innocent and so vulnerable with their love of iced tea and skittles. I will hold my son as close as he will allow and, yes, I will buy him skittles tonight. He loves them.
JMO
Yep, just brush it under the rug, it will all come down out in the wash. The life of a 17-year-old child is nothing.
Arrest zimmerman now!!
Tray can be heard on a recording screaming "HELP!" less than a second before Zimmerman shot him dead.I certainly think he was suspected, and followed because he was Black.
I don't think that's why he was killed. I believe he was killed because GZ was in fact in real danger of serious injury or death.
And that's it, in a nutshell. For all the discussions of whether it's right to follow someone, what the reasons were the GZ suspected Trayvon of wrongdoing, all those things are extraneous details IMHO.
The nutshell. Did GZ have reason to believe he was in serious danger at the moment he pulled his gun and shot Trayvon? I say it's likely.
If you listen to the 911 call that recorded Tray's screams http://audioboo.fm/boos/717346-911-call-screaming-and-gunshots-audible#t=0m0s it is clearly a child screaming for help. He is begging for his life. His last word is "help" before you hear him being murdered in cold blood.
In my opinion, IF - and I repeat - IF it were Zimmerman doing the screaming, the anxiety that he was feeling wouldn't just stop. IF it were Zimmerman putting up that struggle and screaming for his life, he would have continued to be hysterical until he could collect himself after supposedly coming so close to being killed. He wouldn't just casually ask the neighbor to call the cops.
It is unbelievable to me that anyone who has listened to that recording would even consider that it is not Trayvon doing the screaming.
Zimmerman is very well protected by Fl self-defense law (despite what people who wrote it now say). If he is considered an aggressor, he would not be protected-but for that they would have to prove he is the one that started the fight. There are no witnesses as far as I can tell that can prove it one way or the other. And authorities don't seem to think that they can consider him following Trayvon an act of aggression in itself. So what exactly should be done in this situation?
He states they always get away and then goes after him to make sure he did not get away.
Why else did he follow him?
He followed him to make sure he did not get away. He armed himself, he got out of his truck to make sure he did not get away.
He had no evidence he had done anything but he was going to make sure he did not get away.
There was evidence of a scuffle.
Evidence points to CZ going after the kid to make sure he did not get away.
Especially May 4th, 1970.
He states they always get away and then goes after him to make sure he did not get away.
Why else did he follow him?
He followed him to make sure he did not get away. He armed himself, he got out of his truck to make sure he did not get away.
He had no evidence he had done anything but he was going to make sure he did not get away.
There was evidence of a scuffle.
Evidence points to CZ going after the kid to make sure he did not get away.
Lets say they arrest him. But when he comes at trial there is no enough evidence to prove anything and he is let go. Is that going to make anyone happy?
Zimmerman is very well protected by Fl self-defense law (despite what people who wrote it now say). If he is considered an aggressor, he would not be protected-but for that they would have to prove he is the one that started the fight. There are no witnesses as far as I can tell that can prove it one way or the other. And authorities don't seem to think that they can consider him following Trayvon an act of aggression in itself. So what exactly should be done in this situation?