I don't think it was "directed" at you. If you check back, I have been asking the question since the 1st page of the criminal affidavit for murder says the offense was committed on April 1st and if they know he was alive on April 3rd due to signing power of attorney, phone calls, witnesses, then why don't they put down a date after they know he was still alive, such as 4/3 or as Sheriff Gee says, 4/6 - 4/7/09. It was really baffling to me why they would do that. But the explanation that ACR was offering seems like a very plausable answer to my question. It isn't just murder, it is premeditated murder, and it could be they used the date 4/1/09 because that is the first date that they can actually prove she set out to murder Abraham. Premeditated can be in a second, but in this case, they may actually be able to prove the premeditation starting on that date, such as that was the date she recorded the video of him watching the tapes in March, or that was the date she bought the gun, or that was the date she purchased the backhoe (although I believe she purchased it on 4/3).
It has been a question that really bothered me because I knew they believed she killed him between 4/6-4/7/09, yet they had put 4/1/09 knowing he was still alive that date.
I also don't think anyone is trying to prove anyone elses theories wrong per say. I think that people have different theories and they are expressing their own views. Many of my "theories" have crashed and burned because someone else has pointed out a better theory or showed me a public record that proves I was mistaken but I would have been sitting here misinformed had I not expressed my theory and then had someone else show me something I had missed or told me another way to look at it. I thought both the property and the money had gone through the LLC because of the criminal affidavit, but ACR corrected me and pointed to the actual deeds and assignments showing that was not necessarily true, the criminal affidavit could be wrong. Got me back on the same page with the rest of you who already knew that and helped me to understand why DebM has no control over the property Dorice took from Abraham, she put it in the other company.
So, I have found that if I am wrong, someone else here will tell me and show me why then I have learned something. Alternatively, if I have a theory about something but it is inference from the facts available, someone else here can come to a totally different theory about it. Doesn't make me right or them right, just 2 different ways at looking at the same information. I may not agree with what they say, but at least I have seen another possibility. I've learned a lot from the different opinions here and the facts the posters have found and posted.