Found Deceased FL - AMBER ALERT: Diana Alvares, 9, Fort Myers, 29 May 2016 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
http://floridadefenders.com/florida-criminal-defense/obscenity-laws-florida

We need to know the specific statue he is charged with violating

Selling *advertiser censored* to minors
Showing *advertiser censored* to minors
*advertiser censored* crimes such as:
Transmitting *advertiser censored* to a minor
Showing a pornographic video of yourself to a minor
Traveling to meet a minor for sexual purpose
Trying to meet a minor for sexual purpose in a chat room or
Possessing child *advertiser censored*
Buying or selling a minor for a sexual purpose and
Holding computer services liable for illegal pornographic acts committed on their servers


There is also:

847.0145 Selling or buying of minors; penalties.
 
Not in state. Extradition is only for out of state. In state the other county has 5 days to pick you up and t doesn't matter how you feels about it. They can bail if there is a bail from the other county though.

http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/index.php?r=crimeActivity/inmateIndex

Still no record for Jorge showing. How can they transfer from one jail to another with no charges? I guess you have to agree to go to the other jail, right? Typically they have a court hearing to have them transferred. But we've seen nothing of any court hearings, or charges. Strange, IMO!
 
With that possible prison of 20yrs and fine of $250,000, there's much more than *advertiser censored* found, IMO!
 
Hmmm...not good

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 
I am assuming his charge is for child *advertiser censored* and now my hopes are dashed. :stormingmad:
Disgusting.
Hope it was on his phone. Now police can look for evidence on it, deleted pics, etc.
 

What? Was he not allowed to have *advertiser censored* because of a previous conviction? Is he on probation? Or was it child *advertiser censored* or snuff, or wth?

Obviously there is something illegal about the *advertiser censored* he was in possession of. I think we would have heard about a past record involving something like this, if there was one. IDK

Also, it says he's probably going to be held in Charlotte County? WHY? I don't understand.

Dang, they don't have anything on him yet for Diana. Nothing!!!
 
They have to have some kind of idea ...right ? Or there would be major searches .... Pleas for help etc ?

I'm so confused


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What? Was he not allowed to have *advertiser censored* because of a previous conviction? Is he on probation? Or was it child *advertiser censored* or snuff, or wth?

Obviously there is something illegal about the *advertiser censored* he was in possession of. I think we would have heard about a past record involving something like this, if there was one. IDK

Also, it says he's probably going to be held in Charlotte County? WHY? I don't understand.

Dang, they don't have anything on him yet for Diana. Nothing!!!

It has to be illegal *advertiser censored* in some manner with a bond that high so it has to be some kind of kiddie *advertiser censored* or something to do with young underage children. I was just talking to my best friend this morning, and we both felt they would find kiddie *advertiser censored* on this guy.

I am so heartbroken to see all of this. The parents were right, imo, he had an abnormal attraction to little Diana since she was a young child.:(

I suppose Charlotte County is where the Feds want to pick him up since its a federal offense. They may think he would be severely harmed if brought back to Lee County.

My hopes are dashed completely for little Diana. The man she thought she knew, liked, and trusted was nothing more than a vile putrid pedophile.:(

Imo
 
If the *advertiser censored* involved Diana, he would have been charged with something on her. I am still getting the feeling this is bigger than just him. And they are trying to figure it out or find the others involved, before changing charges. I'm losing hope for her. But where is she?
 
This guy is a shifty guy - for a reason! If the only evidence on him is *advertiser censored* on his phone, LE would not have had that until they arrested him and had access to his phone. Right?

Or would LE have been able to get a judge to sign off on a warrant to get his phone records as a suspect in the missing Diana case?

It is beginning to sound like LE cannot connect him to Diana. It seems odd that he has no record but is being looked at as a suspect in Diana's missing case. Something isn't connecting in this story! In fact, is Jorge Guerrero even his name?

Every day a new twist in this story. So what we knew yesterday, doesn't apply to what we know today! :gaah:
 
His Facebook- to me -was *advertiser censored*. Anyway I think 20 years in prison was a lot-because the Subway guy had sex with minors and possession of *advertiser censored* and he got 15 years.

(Jared Fogle Sentenced To 15 Years In Prison For Sex With Minors, Child Pornograpy)
 
I just don't know what to think. So many twists as you said.
I am starting to wonder if they even have the right guy or are they determined to pin him to cover their own behinds....

This guy is a shifty guy - for a reason! If the only evidence on him is *advertiser censored* on his phone, LE would not have had that until they arrested him and had access to his phone. Right?

Or would LE have been able to get a judge to sign off on a warrant to get his phone records as a suspect in the missing Diana case?

It is beginning to sound like LE cannot connect him to Diana. It seems odd that he has no record but is being looked at as a suspect in Diana's missing case. Something isn't connecting in this story! In fact, is Jorge Guerrero even his name?

Every day a new twist in this story. So what we knew yesterday, doesn't apply to what we know today! :gaah:
 
This guy is a shifty guy - for a reason! If the only evidence on him is *advertiser censored* on his phone, LE would not have had that until they arrested him and had access to his phone. Right?

Or would LE have been able to get a judge to sign off on a warrant to get his phone records as a suspect in the missing Diana case?

It is beginning to sound like LE cannot connect him to Diana. It seems odd that he has no record but is being looked at as a suspect in Diana's missing case. Something isn't connecting in this story! In fact, is Jorge Guerrero even his name?

Every day a new twist in this story. So what we knew yesterday, doesn't apply to what we know today! :gaah:

All of it makes sense to me from the abnormal flirty attention he gave a little 9 year old girl who is NOW missing to finding the worst *advertiser censored* (kiddie) imaginable. It all fits. Imo, he is going to fit in the category of an acquaintance who kidnapped a child he knew. I firmly believe Diana is no longer with us. These creeps have their way with their prey quickly and then snuff out their lives because they then become a liability.:(

It is very hard to connect even a guilty person without a body. So I am not shocked he isn't being charged with anything to do with Diana now. They only get one bite at the apple so they will wait until the time is right. Some missing body cases didn't even go to trial until many years had passed since the victim was last seen even though LE knew all along who the perpetrator was.

The investigation is just beginning. They will continue to investigate this case thoroughly and they wont stop until he is put in prison where he belongs, no matter how long that may take. IMO Meanwhile they will follow up on all tips and hope they can locate her one way or the other.

I knew he wouldn't talk and he isn't going to talk. He will continue to think his ace in the hole is them not being able to locate the victim's body just like Sierra Lamar's kidnapper, rapist and murderer.

IMO
 
In the meantime no peep from paternal side of Diana ( app. 34 hrs of driving time from Florida to Tehuacan, Mexico ) ?

-Nin
 
It always blows my mind the risks these pedofiles will take. It's like their unholy urge is overwhelming, and they can't control them selfs, even at the risk of being caught. I hate them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
253
Guests online
1,587
Total visitors
1,840

Forum statistics

Threads
599,602
Messages
18,097,357
Members
230,889
Latest member
Grumpie13
Back
Top