FL-AMBER ALERT Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs. old - Putnam County #7

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me try this again...........................

UCN: 542005DR001321FDXXXX
File Date: 2005-09-16
Disposition Date: 2007-11-08
File Type: PATERNITY - FD12
Judge: A W NICHOLS III


Plaintiffs
CUMMINGS RONALD LEMYLES
Defendants
SHEFFIELD CRYSTAL DIANE

Date​
Docket Description​
2005-09-16
001.PETITION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND RELATED RELIEF


2005-09-16
002.IDENTIFICATION - DRIVER'S LICENSE


2005-09-16
003.UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION/ENFORCEMENT AFFID.


2005-09-16
004.FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - PETITIONER


2005-09-16
005.NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY - PETITIONER


2005-09-16
006.REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED


2005-09-16
007. SUMMONS ISSUED:CRYSTAL DIANE SHEFFIELD 9/19/2005


2005-09-16
.ADDRESS:11024 ARROWBROOK JAX FL 32221


2005-09-16
.SUMM RT 10-26-05 SVD 10-05-05 DUE 10-25-05


2005-10-18
012. ANSWER FILED BY PETITIONER


2005-10-18
012. ANSWER FILED BY RESPONDENT


2005-10-26
008. MOTION TO SET HEARING


2005-10-26
009. MOTION FOR DEFAULT


2005-10-27
010. DEFAULT ENTERED


2005-10-27
011.CLERK'S CERTIFICATE


2005-11-01
013. EMERGENCY VERIFED MOTION FOR CHILD PICK-UP ORDER


2005-11-01
014.UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION/ENFORCEMENT AFFID.


2005-11-01
015. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT - EEH


2005-11-01
016.ORDER OF REFERRAL TO GENERAL MAGISTRATE - EEH


2005-11-01
.PETITION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND FOR RELATED RELIEF


2005-11-01
.FILED BY PETITIONER


2005-11-22
017. COPY - NOTICE OF HEARING - 12-01-05 @ 9:00 RMP


2005-11-22
.PETITIONERS MOTION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY


2005-12-01
018. FAMILY COURT MIN - PET. PRES, RESP. NOT PRES,


2005-12-01
.C/S TO BE DETERMINED, SHARED PRIMARY RESIDENTAL WITH


2005-12-01
.FATHER,. STANDARD AT FATHER DISCREATION, JUDICALLY


2005-12-01
.RECOGNIZED 05-1354 -FD, RONALD CUMMINGS DECLARED LEGAL


2005-12-01
.FATHER OF BOTH CHILDREN , SHARED PARENTAL RESPONSLIBILTY


2005-12-01
.WITH PRIMARY RESIDENTAL WITH FATHER, STANDARD


2005-12-01
.VISITATION DISCRESTION OF FATHER IF SAFETY FOR THE


2005-12-01
.CHILDREN CONCERNS ADVISE, 24 HRS NOTICE TO EXCERSISE


2005-12-01
.VISITATION , MOTHER NOT TO REMOVE CHILDREN FROM THE


2005-12-01
.STATE OF FLORIDA WITHOUT FATHERS WRITTN CONSENT OR


2005-12-01
.FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT


2005-12-05
021.REPORT/RECOMMENDATION OF GENERAL MASTER-MP


2005-12-05
.PET. FOUND TO BE FATHER OF MINOR CHILDREN, SHARED


2005-12-05
.PARENTAL RESPONSLIBLITY, WITH PETITIONER HAVING


2005-12-05
.PRIMARY RESIDENTAL CUSTODY, UNSUPERVISED VISITATION


2005-12-05
.ACCORDING TO STANDARD VISITATION SCHEDULE, MOTHER TO


2005-12-05
.PAY C/S OF $323/MTH TO BEGININING WHEN ORDER SIGNED


2005-12-05
.BOTH PARTIES TO MAINTAIN MEDICAID INSURANCE ON BOTH


2005-12-05
.CHILDREN


2005-12-05
019. NOTICE OF CURRENT ADDRESS - CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD


2005-12-05
020.IDENTIFICATION - DRIVER'S LICENSE - RESPONDENT


2005-12-06
022. FAXED LETTER FROM RESPONDENT TO MAGISTRATE IN RE:


2005-12-06
.REHEARING


2005-12-08
023. RETURN TO SENDER - REPORT AND RECOMMEDATION - RESP.


2005-12-13
024. NOTICE OF HEARING - 12-27-05 @ 10:30 RMP - PETITIONERS


2005-12-13
.MOTION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND RELATED RELIEF


2005-12-13
025. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REHEARING - RMP -


2005-12-27
026.CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF PARENTING CLASS


2005-12-27
RESPONDENT


2005-12-27
027.FAMILY COURT MINUTES


2006-01-03
028.REPORT/RECOMMENDATION OF GENERAL MASTER-MP


2006-01-06
029. MOTION FOR REHEARING AND OBJECTION TO FINDINGS


2006-01-06
OF MAGISTRATE


2006-01-20
030.MOTION TO STRIKE OR DIMISS MOTION FOR REHEARING


2006-01-20
AND OBJECTION TO FINDINGS OF MAGISTRATE-PETITIONER


2006-01-24
031.NOTICE OF HEARING-HRG SET FOR 02/28/06 @ 1:30


2006-01-24
EEH-COURTROOM 305


2006-01-25
032.NOTICE OF HEARING-HRG SET FOR 02/28/06 @ 1:30-EEH


2006-01-31
033.CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION-HUSBAND


2006-02-28
034.FAMILY COURT MINUTES


2006-03-02
035.NOTICE OF HEARING-SET FOR 04/06/06 @ 3:00


2006-03-09
036.EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RETURN OF CHILDREN - PETITIONER


2006-03-15
037.NOTICE OF HEARING - HRG SET FOR 03/21/06 @ 10:30


2006-03-16
038.SUBPOENA FOR HEARING - HRG SET FOR 03/21/06 @ 10:30


2006-03-16
SUBPOENA FOR: MICHAEL S WORD C/O WALMART DISTRIBUTION


2006-03-16
CENTER


2006-03-20
039.NOTICE OF FILING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR


2006-03-20
PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH MINOR


2006-03-20
CHILDREN


2006-03-21
040.FAMILY COURT MINUTES


2006-03-22
041.ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RETURN OF CHILDREN


2006-03-22
042.NOTICE OF FILING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR


2006-03-22
PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH MINOR


2006-03-22
CHILDREN


2006-04-04
043.NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING


2006-04-12
044.NOTICE OF UN-AVAILABILITY-CHARLES BEHM-ESQUIRE


2006-08-17
045.NOTICE OF HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE


2006-08-17
HRG SET FOR 10/04/06 @ 3:00 - EEH


2006-10-04
046.FAMILY COURT MINUTES-PET NOT PRESENT-R MURPHY PRESENT


2006-10-04
RESP NOT PRESENT-C BEHM PRESENT


2006-12-28
047.NOTICE OF HEARING - HRG SET FOR 01/04/017 @ 3:30


2007-01-04
048.NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT - RESPONDENT


2007-01-26
049.NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS


2007-01-26
OF MAGISTRATE-HRG SET FOR 02/13/07 @ 2:00 - EEH


2007-02-13
050.FAMILY COURT MINUTES PET PR RESP PR


2007-02-22
051.NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL - BEHM


2007-05-11
052.CORRESPONDENCE FROM NANCY GRIFFIS TO EEH


2007-11-08
053.ORDER APPROVING REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE


2007-11-26
FL#200754636011


2008-06-16
054.DOR INTERCEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $48.00 ON 06/16/08


2009-02-10
055.MOTION FOR CONTEMPT 03-27-09 AT 08:30
 
does anyone know if anybody at all in either of the families has physically been searching for the child? I get the media impression that nobody is. I think one of the grandparents said she thinks the child is no longer in Putman County, can not figure out why she said that. and whomever took the child , it could have been by boat, from the dock, to get to the other side of the river quickly. my opinion is this particualar kid did not just disappear for no reason. the people who did it had to know the routines and the trailer and the people they were dealing with.
 
passionflower said:
IMO, at Haleighs age, if she got out on her own she would be in the neighborhood crying.......someone would hear or see her.
What was the temperature that night? full moon IIRC.......moonlight skies.......in Fla was it clear or cloudy? rainy?
Click to expand...

Good point! Also,if she had climbed up and unlocked the door and got out on her own, would she also have gone to get the cinder block and propped the screen door open. I don't think she would have thought that,nor could she lift and carry a heavy cinder block.
 
Call me dumb, but what is the difference between "proping open a door" and say breaking in?
Mainly has LE thorougly searched the 5 mile SO's home?
 
panthera said:
Haleigh wasn't with her mother so I'm not surprised by her answers. But what I've noticed is no plea to whoever has Haleigh to please return her unharmed. It's like she's also blaming Haleigh's dad for anything that happened. MOO
Click to expand...


I saw a clip of the bio mom crying and very upset today for the first time, and she did say she just wanted her little girl home. The media seems to be focusing more on the g/f and dad, since Haleigh lived with him and not the mother.
To me, it's like the mother or grandmother don't want to say a lot against the g/f for fear of making the dad angry or something. He does seem to have a bit of an anger problem, evidenced by his f-bombs to the 911 operator and screaming at her like he did.
 
Busylady said:
But she already admitted she had a drug conviction and substance abuse problem and that is why she didnt have custody. I have no clue what thread it is on but it was during an interview she gave. The custody order also states the father controls when she can see the kids based on their safety. Do not think a judge would order that unless there was a good reason. I am taking everything the bio mom says with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...

His record doesn't look much prettier. The custody decision looked like the lesser of two evils to me. I may not have a ton of respect for biomom but I don't think she is suspect either. MOO
 
Nonni Brenda said:
Sorry, I know this is a repeat, but I just got here. When did the dad call the GF a "biotch"? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

I believe it was in the 911 call, or when LE arrived, sorry everything is moving so fast but he blamed her for Haleigh being gone because the stupid biotch was the one home when Haleigh went missing.
 
Littleone48 said:
I agree. I saw the interview yesterday and the bio mom had nothing bad to say about dad, but her mom tried. Tonight a whole different story. I think I will wait to see if anything the bio mom says is true.

As for the dad getting custody IMO the mom had to have had some problems. Judges are not that fast to grant custody to dads without good reason. Sorry , I have to side with the dad on this one.

The Bio moms myspace speaks volumes to me...brats?
Click to expand...
got a link to her myspace please?
 
Seahorseladydi said:
contempt for what??????????? against who?????

sorry..... still so lost
Click to expand...

There's an ongoing Paternity/Custody case in Putnum County, Florida between the parents - Ronald Cummings and Crystal Diane Sheffield.

I found this case yesterday and checked it today and noticed that someone has filed a "contempt of court" charge, which is to be heard in March.

I've posted the docket for this case above.......................
 
djk said:
does anyone know if anybody at all in either of the families has physically been searching for the child? I get the media impression that nobody is. I think one of the grandparents said she thinks the child is no longer in Putman County, can not figure out why she said that. and whomever took the child , it could have been by boat, from the dock, to get to the other side of the river quickly. my opinion is this particualar kid did not just disappear for no reason. the people who did it had to know the routines and the trailer and the people they were dealing with.
Click to expand...

My thought exaclty, i just see them hagnin around. I agree, hey do u thinks its possible someone from the bio moms fam did it?? and Haliegh is somewhere in atlanta ??
 
TY Busylady...if thats true I wonder why she told NG that other story about how he got custoday over her. :waitasec: I guess "not" showing for the hearing sealed her fate. Even so, she says she didnt get a fair shake how it went down. ....I know....I would have to agree to take everything any of the persons related with a grain of salt. We are dealing with a whole nother set of dynamics with this case arent we. o/t...at least we know who the daddy is, in this case. :rolleyes:

Busylady said:
But she already admitted she had a drug conviction and substance abuse problem and that is why she didnt have custody. I have no clue what thread it is on but it was during an interview she gave. The custody order also states the father controls when she can see the kids based on their safety. Do not think a judge would order that unless there was a good reason. I am taking everything the bio mom says with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...
 
panthera said:
Haleigh wasn't with her mother so I'm not surprised by her answers. But what I've noticed is no plea to whoever has Haleigh to please return her unharmed. It's like she's also blaming Haleigh's dad for anything that happened. MOO
Click to expand...

I know she wasn't with her bio-mom. I must just be more suspicious than most. I would have called the school and found out, especially when the bio-dad and the GF keep giving different accounts of the same few hours.
 
LancelotLink said:
I know she wasn't with her bio-mom. I must just be more suspicious than most. I would have called the school and found out, especially when the bio-dad and the GF keep giving different accounts of the same few hours.
Click to expand...

I dont get the feeling she is the type of mom to be to concerned about it. Maybe now with all the media glare but then....not so much.
 
2005-12-05
.ACCORDING TO STANDARD VISITATION SCHEDULE, MOTHER TO


2005-12-05
.PAY C/S OF $323/MTH TO BEGININING WHEN ORDER SIGNED

2008-06-16
054.DOR INTERCEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $48.00 ON 06/16/08

2009-02-10
055.MOTION FOR CONTEMPT 03-27-09 AT 08:30
Click to expand...
Hmmm...I am guessing bio mom didn't pay her required $325 since they intercepted $48.00.

X add this to the column of mom for motive.
 
Leila said:
There's an ongoing Paternity/Custody case in Putnum County, Florida between the parents - Ronald Cummings and Crystal Diane Sheffield.

I found this case yesterday and checked it today and noticed that someone has filed a "contempt of court" charge, which is to be heard in March.

I've posted the docket for this case above.......................
Click to expand...

it looks like it might be for child support. that will warrant a contempt charge if the biomom isnt paying it like is mandated by the court.
 
Was the the house where Jessica Lunsford was taken from made a crime scene and no one could stay there?

How bout the Smarts house, Klaas house, etc. This seems like a new and unusual move by LE to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 71 more.
Total: 249 (members: 72, guests: 177)

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
177
Total visitors
249
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,494
Messages
18,254,822
Members
234,664
Latest member
wrongplatform
Back
Top